All You Need To Know About The Immunisation Legislation in Australia

No Jab No Pay (No Way)

Many families have expressed concerns because of the confusion and conflicting information being circulated around the new No Jab, No Pay/Play legislation, all of which is to come into effect on 1 January 2016.
Hopefully the following information will assist by providing some clarification…

1) The “No Jab, No Pay” vs “No Jab, No Play” legislation

  • “No Jab, No PAY”
    This is Commonwealth legislation which affects families nationwide, but only to receipt of certain social security benefits from the Commonwealth Government (via Centrelink). It does not relate to enrolment or attendance in childcare. Apart from the Child Care Rebate and all Child Care Benefits (including Grandparent Child Care Benefit, Special Child Care Benefit or Jobs, Education and Training Child Care Fee Assistance), the only affected benefit is the Family Tax Benefit A end-of-year annual supplement (presently $726 per child). The other FTB Part A and Part B benefits are NOT affected.…/Bills_…/Bills_Search_Results/Result…

  • “No Jab, No PLAY”
    This is the state legislation that has been passed this year in Victoria, so is applicable only in Victoria and relates only to access to child care and kindergarten in Victoria. It affects only access to child care after 1 January 2016.…/52ba728ec6089985ca257ec…

If you live in Victoria and may be affected after 1 January 2016 by the Victorian legislation, enrolment of your child (confirmed in writing) before 1 January 2016 will protect you from being impacted by this legislation.

Similar legislation has also been passed this year in Queensland but it will only have a potential effect on child care access (in Queensland). Enrolment of your child in child care in Queensland before 1 January 2016 will not provide any protection against any impact of this legislation.

The Conscientious Objection exemption for access to child care in NSW remains available because there has been no change to the relevant NSW legislation since the 2013 NSW “No Jab, No Play” legislation came into effect on 1 Jan 2014.…/PubHealthChVaccOLAB15.p…

2) 63-day grace period in relation to “No Jab, No Pay”

Parents who prior to 1 January 2016 have already been receiving the linked benefits, but whose children will from 1 January 2016 no longer meet the “immunisation requirements” will have a 63-day grace period in which to resolve the situation before any of the linked benefits are denied.
The “No Jab, No Pay” legislation removes 63-day grace period from 1 January 2016 for new claims only.

3) Which vaccines are linked to the benefits

The vaccines that are linked to the benefits to which “No Jab, No Pay” relates do NOT include all of those on the National Immunisation Program (NIP) schedule up to the age of 5.
The benefits-linked schedules are instead set completely independently of the NIP by the Minister, and presently include fewer vaccines than are included in the NIP. The benefits-linked schedules are set out in these two legislative instruments:

These schedules:
• do not include any vaccines that are on the NIP schedule for over 5 years of age.
• do not include all of the vaccines that are on the NIP schedule for under 5 years of age. The scheduled vaccines depend upon when the child was born.

4) “Valid consent” restriction upon Immunisation Providers

Immunisation Providers (IPs) will continue to be prohibited at law from vaccinating without voluntary and informed consent.

  1. a) Re voluntary consent requirement

Immunisation Providers will continue to be obliged, in relation to each vaccine, before it is administered, to:
• ensure that the parent’s consent is given “voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation”

Therefore, an IP cannot legally vaccinate the child if the IP is made aware that the parent is not able to provide voluntary consent. The IP may be prosecuted for doing so and held liable for civil assault and any resultant injury, loss or damage.

So if the parent is unable to provide voluntary consent, it is important that there be a record of:
• the involuntary nature of any consent by the parent, and
• the consequent refusal to vaccinate by the IP(s).…/Handbook10-home~handbook10part2~…

A form has been designed for this purpose for parents in this situation, see below.

I, …………………………………………….…..
name and title of Immunisation Provider

confirm that ……………………………..………
name of parent/s

has/have presented their child ..…………………..………………..………….…..
name of child

on this date………….… for the following vaccinations: ………..…. ……..……

I acknowledge that the consent provided by …………………………………….. name of parent/s
is not voluntary consent.

Given the absence of voluntary consent, I am/am not willing to proceed with the vaccination of

name of child

Signed by: …………………………………………………
name and title of provider

In the presence of : …………………………………………………
signature of witness

name of witness

The Immunisation Provider, upon being presented with the form, will either:
(1) complete the form in such a way as to indicate that the IP is not willing to proceed with the vaccination, and will then sign the form, or
(2) decline to sign the form, in which case the parent may sign a Statutory Declaration stating that the parent asked the IP to sign the form and the IP refused. This will have the same effect as (1).

The wording of the Statutory Declaration might be as follows:

I, ……………………………….. confirm that I has/have presented my child …..………………..
name of parent/s name of child

to ……………………………..…………………
name and title of Immunisation Provider

on this date………… for the following vaccinations: ……………….. ………………

I informed the Immunisation Provider that my consent is not voluntary consent.

I presented the attached form and requested the Immunisation Provider to complete and sign the form. The Immunisation Provider then refused to sign the form.

Signed by: …………………………………………………
name of parent/s

In the presence of : …………………………………………………
signature of witness

name of witness


The parent may then lodge a complaint through Centrelink on the grounds that they are being disadvantaged through no fault of their own.

Imagine if thousands of us turned up to Centrelink with these forms to make complaints about not being able to fulfill our vaccination requirements because doctors cannot breach informed consent, what a great spanner to throw in the works.

6) Law versus guidelines, and how that affects responsibility and liability

If the parent requests a GP/IP to assess their child in relation to:
• whether a medical exemption is appropriate (i.e. one or more vaccinations are “not in the best interests of the child’s health”), and/or
• determining the appropriate catch-up schedule (i.e. which, if any, vaccine doses are appropriate to include and when),
the GP/IP ought to be reminded of the following:

The Australian Immunisation Handbook is only a general guide

The “No Jab, No Pay” and related legislation directs the Immunisation Provider (IP) and/or general practitioner to the Australian Immunisation Handbook 10th edition (“the Handbook”) for guidance in relation to either of the above two areas.

However, the Australian Government states in these disclaimers that the Handbook “reflects the views of the authors and not necessarily the views of the Australian Government” and is only “a general guide”. It warns that “it is possible that errors have been missed” in relation to “dosage recommendations”, which “are continually being revised and new adverse events recognized.”

Liability will still likely rest with IP/GP or parent

Accordingly, the Australian Government will likely continue to “not accept any liability for any injury, loss or damage incurred by use of or reliance on the information” in the Handbook.…/Handbook10-home~handbook10-…

For further information, please contact us and we will try our best to help you.

This information was compiled by Bronwyn Hancock.


Document on Risks for Blackfulla’s


The only Medical Exemption that is still valid. 

Click to access im011-1512en.pdf

Click to access im011-1512en.pdf

Click to access im011-1512en.pdf

Click to access im011-1512en.pdf

Click to access im011-1512en.pdf


Finding a holistic GP


Forced immunisation campaign killed every 2nd Child between 70-71 in N.T.

Major warning: Ascorbic acid or vitamin C status should be determined by a knowledge of dietary intake or by measuring urinary levels of the vitamin. Infants who are borderline or doubtful should not be immunised.

Because of the impact of invasion, moving us close to towns, we were provided with a diet of white flour, white sugar, white bread, jam, tea and sausages; a far cry from our natural diet.

Forced Vaccinations Had A 50% Fatality Rate
There was a forced vaccination campaign in 1970-1 in the Northern Territory where forced vaccinations had a 50% fatality rate. This was reported by Dr Archie Kalokerinos, who was there during that time. He later wrote a book on it, called ‘Every Second Child’.

More information on the picture attached.

Choose for Yourself – Your free choice, once fully-informed, can change the whole world – at least your world, for a start
Minimise the risk, before considering immunisation – Have a thorough medical examination, take note of case histories, check dietary deficiencies. Only healthy people should be given immunisation, if they choose that is. Infants who have suffered repeated infections should not be immunised.

Spread the Word – To family, friends, workmates, to lower their risks too. Help regain our right and freedom to choose for ourselves.

Fear of disease isn’t ours.

With the rise of agriculture in industrial nations came the rise of disease.

While we still had illness indigenous cultures around the world had little to no epidemic disease and we are anthropologically far more intelligent.


Please share this info with all your friends, even those who vaccinate. This is not an anti vaccine issue. We want to protect our choice and be free from discrimination and financial punishment.
There is a risk, there must be a choice. The government is supplying an illusion of choice. They are bullying low income earners into a form of mandatory vaccination.

By removing the philosophical and religious exemptions as well as family payments the government is forcing a medical procedure onto people who know their family medical history and children better than the government does. This will affect everyone one day. Anyone’s child can have a vaccine reaction. Parents deserve the right to choose their families medical procedures.

Share with others in your kindy, child care or school. Share with colleagues, friends and family. You are supporting pro choice and freedom to choose for all medical procedures not only vaccines.
Whilst the government is promoting this package as “delivering choice for families” it is removing our right to choose this medical intervention and creating a discriminatory welfare policy.



Immunisation requirements for FTB Part A supplement

Children need to be fully immunised, be on a recognised immunisation catch up schedule or have an approved exemption to be eligible for FTB Part A supplement for that period


URGENT (exciting news) – After being urged to call centrelink this was posted by a non vaxing mother –

“Ok, someone I know called Centrelink and they advised that all ME’s uploaded before Jan 1st on the old form will still stand. They won’t be reevaluated as it will cause unnecessary work for doctors and them. So get the below current form signed and sent in before Jan 1st. As the new form (from Jan 1st no Dr will sign off) Good luck!!”

PLEASE don’t just sit this out – take action now, by all means call centrelink to double check, and get your MEs now – make them work for their millions! Bear in mind, not all vaccines are even included on the new catch up schedule so ask for exemptions – in my case, we had a number of reactions to various vaccines so we got them. Many doctors refuse – but take the warranty form for them to sign to guarantee 100% that your child will not be vaccinated. I believe most would rather sign an exemption than that form wink emoticon

PS make sure it’s a MEDICAL exemption because a conscientious objection no longer is valid.

Veritas Aléthia

URGENT – if you are a parent or know parents of young kids in Australia this will affect you. Whether you vaccinate or not, PLEASE READ!!


Only some of the vaccine schedule is even included in the new No Jab No Pay law – meanwhile parents are rushing out to catch up on EVERYTHING. To make it even more difficult and confusing, there are 3 DIFFERENT SCHEDULES – because you know, kids born different years will have different immune systems…

Most doctors are not even telling parents this – they are making hundreds of dollars per child with each catch up, so why would they? Do they even care? The new legislation is NOT about public safety. It is purely about money. In order to roll this out, it is costing hundreds of millions – and will cost hundreds of millions more for the government o offer FREE vaccines – just like the billions it is costing to run the PBS/Medicare.

Most importantly, the money physically being withheld is one payment at the end of the year, amounting to not much over $700 – and of course rebates (which will affect those who use day care). All the current media propaganda is supposedly about the welfare of the public – who do you think pays for those infomercials masquerading as news stories?

Finally, it affects Victoria and QLD a little differently – but for most of Australia, they CANNOT ban your child from day care.

Via Veritas Aléthia

I implore you to look into the safety of vaccines. There is much evidence that suggests that vaccines cause harm to the immune system, and long term problems such as auto immune diseases, allergies and asthma.

Here is a link to dozens of published studies (some on govt websites) that question the toxic ingredient, aluminium, in vaccines:
A list of all known petitions against the Forced Immunisation laws in Australia. Again this is a list im compiling, a living document. Please suggest any edits or other entries.



Provider’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety



Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized


California Infant Dies after 8 Vaccines, Family Gets Him Back from Hospital Cremated


There was a forced vaccination campaign in 1970-1 in the Northern Territory where forced vaccinations had a 50% fatality rate.



10 deaths linked to anti-flu vaccines


Bill Gates’ Polio Vaccine Program Eradicates Children, Not Polio


Tetanus vaccines found spiked with sterilization chemical to carry out race-based genocide against Africans

Learn more:


1 in 38 Sout Korean Schoolchildren Have AUTISM After Mandated MMR Vaccinations


June 1990, babies in Los Angeles California were used as human guinea pigs


What We All Need To Consider:

1) When you receive a vaccination, you don’t just make antibodies to what’s in the shot. A chemical in the vaccine, called an adjuvant, forces you to make antibodies to everything it can find in your body, and like a loaded freight train going down a hill, it can keep pushing your body faster and faster to make more and more inflammation.  The older you are, the more viruses, spirochetes (Lyme Disease and associated co-infections), and other opportunistic pathogens come back to life.  This makes the Gardasil HPV Vaccine potentially dangerous and life threatening, and since severe reactions and seizures may be delayed by years, very few make the connection that it is actually a vaccine injury.


2) Viruses never totally die. One percent of each virus you came into contact with becomes dormant, and lives on in what is called persister cells.  These cells can come back to life when the immune system is compromised because of stress, allergies, lack of sleep, poor food choices, fighting a bug, or because of a vaccination.  Closely spaced vaccinations or “combination” vaccines, such as MMR, guarantee this.  86 to 95% of Americans harbor the Epstein Barr Virus (EBV), which is documented as being associated with autoimmune diseases such as Arthritis. Viruses can come to life days later, OR YEARS LATER! No one would suspect a vaccine that they got a long time ago, could cause seizures 2 or 3 years later, but that is exactly what’s happening with the Gardasil vaccine.  If you have any doubts, call Lloyd at 202-506-8763 between 10a and 6p, EDT.


3) Histamine opens the the blood brain barrier.  If your child’s nose is running, your child’s blood brain barrier is open, and viruses and other “bad guys,” including heavy metals, can travel into the brain and spinal column (Central Nervous System), and sometimes form scars, called lesions.  If your doctor tells you to vaccinate a sick child, dismiss him immediately, and find a qualified doctor.  NOTE:  Half of all doctors graduated in the lower 50% of their class, and most doctors bury their mistakes, until they get caught.


4) The majority of the population has one or more genetic defects, and these can affect the body’s ability to properly control inflammation once it begins. A CD4/CD25/FOXP3 defect will guarantee that your child will develop an inflamed gut, and once the gut barrier is broken, food proteins can come into contact with immune cells, and the immune cells can make antibodies to their favorite foods. If you give a peanut butter sandwich and a glass of milk to your child after a vaccination, he could make antibodies to the bread (gluten), Milk (casein), and Peanuts. This is how vaccines cause food allergies. If you doctor tells you otherwise, find a competent doctor fast, because most doctors bury their mistakes.


5) Food allergies cause mast cells in the gut to produce histamine, which keeps the blood brain barrier open. Histamine also triggers adrenaline and cortisol. Elevated cortisol kills neurons in the hippocampus of the brain, which affects your child’s ability to concentrate and remember things. It also causes increased sensitivity to sound and light, and sometimes an extremely severe headache that can last 24/7. Elevated cortisol levels can also cause a structural change in the hippocampus of the brain, something that may be seen with an MRI.


6) Food allergies also contribute to malabsorption, so your child does not have enough cellular magnesium, potassium, etc., and does not make the proper amount of enzymes to convert many MACRONUTRIENTS into active MICRONUTRIENTS, such as Methyl B12.


7) You now have various degrees of ADD, ADHD, ASD (autism), and other disorders.



FACT: Before the Polio Vaccine, there had never been a virus from another species deliberately injected into humans.

FACT: 61% of all human tumors (at autopsy) now contain the SV40 monkey virus, traceable to the Polio vaccine of the 1950s and 60s

FACT: CUTTER vaccine division and WYETH produced a deadly Polio vaccine with a live virus that actually gave the recipient POLIO!

FACT:  All above information was withheld from the public for years to avoid a public panic and to prevent a loss of faith in vaccines.








Harvard Trained Immunologist Demolishes California Legislation That Terminates Vaccine Exemptions


Austism can be reversed, this is one parents story of how Homeopathy reversed the effects of austism in their son.

Finding a holistic GP

ACNEM, AIMA, or A5M website, you will find a list of GP who practices integrative medicine in your town who might be able to help. In your case, it should be a choice for you to immunise rather than the other way around. Immunisation requires the body to have a balanced immune system for it to work and do no harm.

This is a guide i have been putting together (the AIMA list was down at time of publication), please feel free to add or suggest edits.



Integrative Medicine Practitioners in Australia


ACNEM – Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine list of practitioners Oz



Practice: Dr Rachel Wyndham Health HQ
Ph: 07 552 64444
Address: Level 2/95 Nerang Street
Contact: Rachel Wyndham MBBS ND
Profession: GP, Naturopath
Main interests:Women & Children’s health, Gut health, Mental health, Cancer

Ph: 07 3262 5227
Contact: Frank Golik
Profession: GP
Main interests:dietary – lifestyle – nutritional – homeopathic – herbal – vitamin & mineral supplements – musculo-skeletal
Gives IV/IM Supplements


Ph: 07 3857 3777
Contact: Kathy O’Sullivan
Profession: GP
Main interests: nutrition – acupuncture
Gives IV/IM Supplements


Ph: 07 5562 2088
Contact: David Jaa
Profession: GP
Main interests: musculoskeletal medicine – environmental medicine
Gives IV/IM Supplements – Does Chelation Therapy

Ph: 07 5562 2088
Contact: Ping Jaa
Profession: GP
Main interests: women’s health – acupuncture – environmental medicine
Gives IV/IM Supplements

Practice: Natural Vibrant Health clinic
Ph: 07 5562 5333
Contact: Valerie Cole
Profession: GP
Main interests: Cancer – all chronic diseases – CFS – Fibromyalga – hormonal inbalances, women’s bioidentical hormones – thyroid, adrenal fatigue – paediatrics
Gives: IV/IM Supplements Does: Chelation Therapy

Practice: Natural Vibrant Health clinic
Ph: 07 5562 5333
Contact: Dr Dominique Wells
Profession: Integrative GP
Main interests: Fatigue incl adrenal fatigue, Gut problems, Thyroid, Mental Health incl depression anxiety chronic disease, skin disorders, hormonal imbalances incl menopause
Gives: IV/IM Supplements

Ph: 07 4721 2022
Contact: Raymond Mullen
Profession: GP
Main interests: Intravenous Vitamins, Nutritional medicine, Mind-Body Health, Bioidentical Hormone Therapy, Anxiety / Stress Management, Acupuncture






Practice: Ronston Clinic
Ph: 02 9476 6307
Contact: Dr Jaimini Raniga
Profession: GP
Main interests: Integrative medicine, Womens health, digestive health, bio identical hormones. ayurveda, Adrenal /thyroid issues, fatigue, metabolic syndrome for both clinics Sivanna Health and Royston clinic.

Ph: 02 9918 2288
Contact: Lorna Scott
Profession: GP
Main interests: integrative, nutritional and herbal medicine. Treats children (eczema and recurrent infections) ,womens health, chronic illness, gut and digestive disorders, cancer support.
Gives IV/IM Supplements
Does not treat: Autism, environmental and chemical sensitivity syndromes


Practice: Bellingen Healing Centre
Address: 18 William Street, Bellingen
Ph: 02 6655 0000

Contact: Alayne Simon
Profession: GP
Main Interests: Women’s, Adolescent, Preventative, Family and Mental Heath – Nutrition

Contact: Andrew Heslop
Profession: GP
Main interests: multi system disease presentations – chemical sensitivity – chemical poisoning – heavy metal problems – Biobalance for mental health conditions
Gives IV/IM Supplements


Practice: Sivanna Health

Ph: ​​02 9659 7181

Contact: Dr Jaimini Raniga

Profession: GP

Main interests: Integrative medicine, Womens health, digestive health, bio identical hormones, ayurveda, Adrenal /thyroid issues, fatigue, metabolic syndrome for both clinics Sivanna Health and Royston clinic.

Gives: IV / IM vitamins / minerals




Ph: 02 9973 3646
Contact: Joachim Fluhrer
Profession: GP
Main interests: chronic illness – preventative health assessments – detailed diagnosis & individual treatment – genetic profiling – tailor made therapies – bio-identical hormones
Gives IV/IM Supplements – Does Chelation Therapy

Ph: 02 6652 5322
Contact: Alex Joannou
Profession: GP/ Acupuncturist
Main interests: mental health – sports injuries – arthritis – chronic fatigue syndrome – hormonal problems – IBS – asthma – diabetes
Gives IV/IM Supplements


Practice: Edge Wellness
Ph: 02 9363 5050
Contact: Dr Lyn Tendek
Profession: GP
Main interests: Integrative medicine, womens health, digestive health, bio identical hormones,thyroid & adrenal conditions, mental health.
Does not treat paediatrics


Practice: Pymble Grove Health Clinic
Ph: 02 9418 1388
Contact: Jonathan Turtle
Profession: GP
Main interests: chronic fatigue – FMS – allergies – anti-aging – bio-identical hormones – ADHD – autism. Gives IV/IM Supplements – does Chelation Therapy


Ph: 02 9977 7888
Contact: Emmanual Varipatis
Profession: GP
Main interests: chronic fatigue syndrome – irritable bowel syndrome – metals toxicology – chelation – natural HRT – adjunctine cancer therapies
Gives IV/IM Supplements – Does Chelation Therapy

Practice: Northern Beaches Care Centre
Ph: 02 9913 3744
Contact: Robyn Cosford
Profession: GP
Main interests: chronic fatigue syndrome – children’s behavioural learning & developmental disorders
Gives IV/IM Supplements

Contact: Ameeta Gajjar
Profession: GP
Main interests: Lifestyle & weight management, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, gut health, thyroid/adrenal health, women’s health, health coaching, NLP, time line therapy
Gives iv/im vitamins/minerals
Personal Blog:



Ph: 02 9957 5858
Contact: Therese Lovell
Profession: GP
Main interests: herbal medicine – autoimmune – gynaecology – obstetric problems
Does not treat: rarely see young children


Ph: 02 6680 3208
Contact: Karel Hromek
Profession: GP
Main interests: nutritional – allergies – heavy metals, women’s & men’s health
Gives IV/IM Supplements – Does Chelation Therapy


Ph: 02 9332 0400
Contact: Sandy Eun
Profession: GP
Main interests: gut issues, women’s health, mental health, fatigue, functional medicine, acupuncture
Gives IV/IM supplements
Does not treat: ASD

Ph: 02 9211 3811
Contact: Mark Robertson
Profession: GP/Schlerotherapist
Main interests: all aspects of anti-ageing, nutritional medicine, weight control, adrenal and thyroid problems, cosmetic medicine, mental health problems, autism.
Gives IV/IM Supplements and does chelation therapy.

Practice: The Uclinic
Ph: 02 9332 0400
Contact: Kate Norris
Profession: GP
Main interests: fatigue, thyroid, womens health.
Gives/Does: Chronic Fatigue, ASD, Women’s Health, Fertility, Gut Issues, Thyroid conditions, Anti-ageing.

Practice: Uclinic
Ph: 02 9332 0400
Contact: Min Yeo
Profession: GP
Main Interests: pecial interests as Chronic disease, Women’s health, nutrition, yoga, methylation
Gives IM Supplements


Ph: 02 8064 1131
Contact: Sandeep Gupta
Profession: GP
Main interests: chronic multisystem disease
Website: and


Ph: 02 8868 3800
Contact: Alfred Reigeris
Profession: GP
Main interests:implementing nutritional & herbal therapies into normal medicine esp. chronic illness
Gives IV/IM Supplements

Ph: 02 9623 6628
Contact: Viviane Leventhal
Profession: GP
Main interests: wholistic approach to illness – viral infection – candida – vitamins nutrition – stress management
Does not treat: allergies – cancer – no bulk billing


Practice: Woonona Medical Practice
Address; 44 Hopetoun Street Woonoona
Ph: 02 4283 3433
Contact: Dr Stephen Lyon
Profession: GP
Main interests: Integrative medicine, mental health, children’s health, chronic disease



Practice: Integrative Health Solutions

Contact: Nijole Lloyd 
Profession: all GP
Main Interest: Main interests:nutritional medicine, Prolotherapy, IV Nutrients, Chelation, Anti-Ageing
Gives IV/IM Supplements – Does Chelation Therapy

Contact: Sinclair Bode
Profession: GP
Main Interest: Autism ONLY

Contact: Kerry Harris
Profession: GP
Main Interest: Mental health (Pfeiffer), Gut, dysbiosis, thyroid problems, all general nutritional medicine.
Gives IV/IM Supplements – Does Chelation Therapy
Does not treat: Autism

Contact: Cameron Day
Profession: GP
Main Interest: Musculoskeletal Medicine, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, Complex Medical Problems

Practice: Infinity Health and Wellness Clinic
Ph: 08 8332 1960
Contact: Manmohan (Mona) Kaur
Profession: Integrative GP
Main interests: family nutritional medicine, hormones, natural fertility, gut dysbiosis and liver toxicity, thyroid and adrenal disorders, acupuncture, mind-body medicine, gives IM supplements

Practice: Professional Integrative Medicine
Ph: (08) 8379 1124
Fax: (08) 8379 8110
Contact: Timothy Hall
Profession: Medical Doctor
Main interests: integrative & nutritional medicine, toxicology and heavy metals, mental health, gastroenterology, immune support
Gives IV/IM Supplements and Chelation, Compounding

Practice: Choice of Living Health Centre
Ph: 08 8367 8228
Contact: Wai-Sze Wong
Profession: GP
Main interests: chronic disease management, children’s medicine, lifestyle medicine, obesity

Ph: 08 8332 4100
Contact: Roger Spizzo
Profession: GP
Main interests: Integrated GP, all areas of nutritional medicine, bio-identical hormones, gut dysfunction, fatigue states
Does not treat: Cancer


Ph: 08 8339 2677
Contact: Lindy Poole
Profession: GP
Main interests:female hormonal problems – general nutritional support – supportive remedies in cancer
Gives IV/IM Supplements

Ph: 08 8251 4111
Contact: Louis Skeklios
Profession: GP
Main interests:nutritional & herbal medicine
Gives IV/IM Supplements




Ph: 03 9885 7766
Contact: Peter Holsman
Profession: GP / Naturopath
Main interests: menopause – premenstrual syndrome – digestive problems – chronic fatigue syndrome – counselling


Ph: 9857 5884
Contact: Anjana Arunachalam
Profession: Integrative GP
Main interests: Women’s and men’s health, bio-identical hormones, thyroid disease, Pfeiffer protocol for mental health, biomedical treatment for child behaviour problems, chronic fatigue syndrome, nutritional deficiencies, irritable bowel syndrome, coeliac disease & food allergies, wellness and preventative health consultations.


Practice: Your Health Brighton
Ph: 03 9596 0757;
Address: Suite B, Level 1, 412 Bay Street, Brighton

Contact: Braham Rabinov
Profession: GP
Main interests: Main interests: integrating nutritional and health education into standard medical treatment and illness prevention
Does not treat: terminal cancer

Contact: Robert Hanner
Profession: GP
Main interests:cardiovascular disease – mercury & other toxicity – longevity – hormonal problems – phobias – anxiety disorders
Gives IV/IM Supplements – Does Chelation Therapy
Does not treat: chronic fatigue syndrome – fibromyalgia – cancer

Contact: Jenny McKern 
Profession: GP
Main interests: Nutritional Medicine, Digestive disorders, women’s health, fertility, mental health, children’s behavioural and learning difficulties
Does not treat: cancer

Contact: Stephan McKernan
Profession: GP
Main interests:Chronic Fatigue/Firomyalgia, Depressive & Anxiety related conditions, Musculoskeletal conditions, Gastrointestinal problems, Chronic Illness, Anti-Aging medicine, Allergies & Intolerances, Acupuncture



Practice: Plenty Road Medical Clinic
Address: 105 Plenty Road Bundoora
Phone: 03 9467 5433
Contact: Shamistra Barathan
Profession: GP
Main interests: fatigue, anxiety, IBS, women’s health, combining mindfulness meditation and cognitive behavioural therapy to improve lifestyle factors, which include stress & poor sleep.

Practice: Transformational Medicine Australia
​Ph: 03 9808 2188
Contact: Margaret Ngu
Profession: GP
Main interests: cancer, joint regeneration and pain, anxiety/stress/depression, oxidative medicine, ozone therapies, IPT low dose chemotherapy



Practice: North Road Medical
Ph: 03 9576 9311
Contact: Lynette Hatherley
Profession: GP
Main interests: gastrointestinal disorders, mental health, ADHD, behavioural disorders in children, medical acupuncture
Does not treat: terminal cancer

Ph: 03 9544 5993
Contact: Vicki Kotsirilos
Profession: GP
Main interests: women’s health – mind-body health – any health issue
Gives IM supplements


Total Well-Being and Counseling Centre
Ph: 03 9855 9555
Contact: John Piesse
Profession: GP
Main interests: nutritional medicine, anti-aging medicine, musculo-skeletal medicine,bio-identical hormones, food sensitivities; complementary therapies for cancer, arthritis, diabetes, obesity and weight loss, anxiety & depression;
Gives IM/IV injections per injection clinic.


Practice: NIIM Wellness Clinic
Ph: 03 9804 0646
Address: 21 (11-23) Burwood Road, Hawthorn 3122.

Contact: Dr Iggy Soosay
Profession: GP

Contact: Dr Chris Corcos
Profession: Psychiatrist
Main interests: General adult psychiatry (community based)

Contact: Pamela Dagley
Profession: GP
Main interests:Women’s health – hormones; wide-ranging general practice

Contact: John Piesse
Profession: GP
Main interests: nutritional medicine, anti-aging medicine, musculo-skeletal medicine, bio-identical hormones, food sensitivities; complementary therapies for cancer, arthritis, diabetes, obesity and weight loss, anxiety & sepression;
Gives IM/IV injections per injection clinic.

Contact: David Bird
Profession: GP
Main interests: chronic fatigue syndrome – fibromyalgia
Gives: IV/IM Supplements
Does not treat: cancer


Practice: Dr. John Piesse Kew Practice (Saturday only)
Ph: 03 9852 8924
Contact: John Piesse
Profession: GP
Main interests: nutritional medicine, anti-aging medicine, musculo-skeletal medicine, bio-identical hormones, food sensitivities; complementary therapies for cancer, arthritis, diabetes, obesity and weight loss, anxiety & sepression;
Gives IM/IV injections


Practice: Natural Healing Centre
Ph: 03 9873 0966
Address: 431 Whitehorse Road, Mitcham

Contact: John Piesse
Profession: GP
Main interests: nutritional medicine, anti-aging medicine, musculo-skeletal medicine, bio-identical hormones, food sensitivities; complementary therapies for cancer, arthritis, diabetes, obesity and weight loss, anxiety & sepression;
Gives IM/IV injections



Contact: Trisha Boetto
Profession: GP
Main interests: nutritional medicine – acupuncture – women’s health


Practice: Vitality Hub
Ph: 03 8199 8000
Fax: 03 8692 0554
Address: 224 Malvern Road, Prahran, 3181
Contact: Tania Ash
Profession: GP
Main interests: women’s and men’s health – bio-identical hormones – thyroid disease – Pfeiffer protocol for mental health+biomedical treatment of autism – chronic fatigue syndrome – nutritional deficiences – irritable bowel syndrome – coeliac disease+food allergies – wellness and preventative health

Contact: Kate McCandless
Profession: Naturopath, Nutritionist, GAPS Practitioner
Main interests: Women’s and men’s health, bio-identical hormones, thyroid disease, Pfeiffer protocol for mental health, biomedical treatment for child behaviour problems, chronic fatigue syndrome, nutritional deficiencies, irritable bowel syndrome, coeliac disease & food allergies, wellness and preventative health consultations.
Website: mental health, fatigue, digestive health, skin

Contact: Anjana Arunachalam
Profession: Integrative GP
Main interests: Women’s and men’s health, bio-identical hormones, thyroid disease, Pfeiffer protocol for mental health, biomedical treatment for child behaviour problems, chronic fatigue syndrome, nutritional deficiencies, irritable bowel syndrome, coeliac disease & food allergies, wellness and preventative health consultations.

Ph: 03 9013 1777
Contact: Clare Pyers
Profession: Doctor of Chinese Medicine
Main interests: Traditional Chinese Medicine, acupuncture, nutrition, herbal medicine – for the treatment of fertility, women’s health, digestive disorders, chronic illness, cancer support, endocrine disorders (thyroid, adrenal & metabolic).



Ph: 03 9330 2533
Contact: John Russo
Profession: GP
Main interests:musculoskeletal disorders – stress – fatigue – cardiovascular diseases – respiratory – viral illnesses – acupuncture (needle and laser)
Gives IV/IM Supplements

Ph: 03 5562 9466
Contact: Jonathon Duffy
Profession: GP
Main interests: all aspects of nutritional and environmental medicine
Gives IV/IM Supplements




Practice: Health Quest
Ph: 08 94382299
Contact: Sally Price
Profession: GP
Main interests: ayurveda, nutritional medicine
Gives oral chelation.

Ph: 08 9438 2299/9319 2333
Contact:Hugh Derham
Profession: GP
Main interests: chronic fatigue syndrome – bipolar depression – any chronic illness – fatigue states – insomnia – homeopathy (classical)
Gives IV/IM Supplements


Ph: 08 93372612
Contact: John Troy
Profession: GP
Main interests: Musculoskeletal medicine, nutrition, acupuncture
Does not treat: addiction

Ph: 08 9430 5001
Contact: Keren Witcombe
Profession: GP
Main interests: nutritional and environmental medicine
Does not treat: CSAs or hair analysis


Practice: Mundijong and Serpentine Medical Centre
​Ph: 08 9525 3934
Contact: Brian Walker
Profession: GP
Main interests: nutritional and environmental health, cancer, cardiovascular health.
Gives IV/IM Supplements – Does Chelation Therapy


Ph: 08 9381 3691
Contact: Dane Pervan
Profession: GP
Main interests: vitamins – minerals – heavy metal detoxification
Does not treat: children < 4 years age

​Ph: 08 9381 3691
Contact: Craig Turner
Profession: GP
Main interests: cancer – chronic fatigue – hormonal problems
Gives IV/IM Supplements – Does Chelation Therapy


Ph: 0409 110 550
Contact:Hugh Derham
Profession: GP
Main interests: chronic fatigue syndrome – bipolar depression – any chronic illness – fatigue states – insomnia – homeopathy (classical)




Find an A5M trained Practitioner

 A5M –The AustralAsian Academy of Anti-Ageing Medicine (A5M) is dedicated to advancing longevity science, medicine and technology to detect, prevent, and treat ageing-related diseases and to promote research into methods to slow the human ageing process and promote wellness into older age.


Vitality Hub
224 Malvern Road, Prahran VIC 3181
T: +61 3 8199 8000
Special Interests: Thyroid Disease, Pfeiffer/Walsh bio-medical Protocols for mental health and autism, Women’s Health, Wellness and Preventative Health, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Chronic Fatigue & Fibromyalgia

National Institute of Integrative Medicine
759 Burwood Road, Hawthorn East VIC 3123
T: +61 3 9804 0646
Special Interests: Women’s Health, Hormones, Anti-Ageing Medicine, wide-ranging General Practice

The Ashley Centre
4 Burke Road, Malvern East VIC 3145
T: +61 3 9569 3511
Special Interests: Cosmetic and Anti-Ageing Medicine

DR MARTIN HILL BSc(Hons)(Monash), MSc(NSW), MB.BS(Adel), MSc. Prev.Med.(DIU), FRACGP, AAMS, ABAARM Life-Sense
1327 High Street, Malvern, Vic, 3144
Tel: +03 9822 0133
Special interest: Menopause, Epigenomics, Preventive Medicine, Nutritional and Environmental Medicine, Cosmetic Medicine.

Nova Pharmacy Foresthill
490 Springvale Road Foresthill VIC 3131
T: +61 3 9803 6085
Special Interests: Anit-Ageing and evidence based Nutritional Medicine, Pfeiffer/Walsh bio-medical Protocols for mental health and autism, BHRT

Gladstone Park Medical
1/16 Leslie Road, Essendon VIC 3040
T: +61 3 9330 2533

Marpe Medicine
79 Swanston Street, Geelong VIC 3220
T: +61 3 5223 3831
Special Interests: Nutritional, Environmental and Functional Medicine, IV Vitamin C, Chelation, other IV/IM Therapies, BHRT, Anti-Ageing Medicine

Urban Sense Wellness Clinic
275 St Georges Road Northcote VIC 3070
T: +61 3 9482 5135

Como Natural Medicine
111 Charman Road Beaumaris Vic 3193
T: +61 3 9585 0616
Special interests: Dermatology, Aesthetic & Laser Medicine, Antiageing

Suite 2, 23-27 Wellington Street, St Kilda VIC 3182
T: +61 3 9510 4405

Natspa Clinic
29 Woodland Street Essendon 3040
T: +61 3 9374 2664

â�ºback to top


Australian Menopause Centre
458 Burwood Road, Belmore NSW 2192
T: 1300 883 405 (Aus)
Special Interests: BHRT, Thyroid, Adrenal Fatigue

Bayview Medical Centre
166 Cowper Street, Warrawong NSW 2502
(appts also in Carringbah)
T: +61 2 4276 2199
Special Interests: Anti-Ageing Medicine, BHRT and Cosmetic Medicine

MS VERONA CHADWICK B AppSc(Physio), Dip Manipulative Th, Cert Acupuncture, ACCAM ABAAHP Dip
Get A Life Integrated
30 Wyrallah Rd, East Lismore NSW 2480
T: +61 2 6622 2436
Pymble Grove Health Centre
Suite 11, Level 3, 924 Pacific Highway Gordon NSW 2072
T: +61 2 9981 4542
Kingsway Medical Centre
Suite 1, 729-731 Pittwater Road, Dee Why, NSW 2099
T: +61 2 94181388
Special Interests: Anti-Ageing, Wellness, Hormonal Balance, Functional Medicine, Preventative Health, Functional Medicine

Phoenix Wellness Clinic
486 Swift Street, Albury NSW 2640
T: +61 2 6023 6525
Special Interests: Hormone Optimisation,Anti-ageing Medicine, Advanced Varicose Vein Treatment, Prolotherapy/Muscular skeleton treatments, Threads Non-surgical face/neck lift

Sydney Central Medical Centre
Suite 2/191 Hay Street, Haymarket NSW 2000
T: +61 2 9212 3953

Allcare Medical Centre
192 Heathcote Road, Hammondville NSW 2170
T: +61 2 9825 2222
Special Interests: Acupuncture, Anti-Ageing & Nutritional Medicine

Your Health Manley
15 South Steyne, |Manly NSW 2095
T: +61 2 9977 3436

Verve Cosmetic Clinic
Suite 1/202 Jersey Road, Woollahra NSW 2025
T: +61 2 9363 2224
Special Interests: Cosmetic Medicine, Anti-Ageing Medicine, BHR

Wholistic Medical Centre
Level 1, 17 Randle St, Surry Hills NSW 2010
T: 02 9211 3811
Special Interests: All aspects of Integrative & Nutritional medicine incl BHRT, gut, autism & mental health disorders.

Healthspan Clinic
6/130 Jonson Street, Byron Bay NSW 2481
T: +61 2 6685 3390
Special Interests: Anti-Ageing & Preventative Medicine, Men’s Health, BHRT

468 Swift St Albury NSW 2640
T: 02 6045 8339
Special Interests: Specialising in age related diseases using modest dietary interventions, supplements and herbal formula lifestyle changes that can significantly impact health function in ageing.

â�ºback to top


Wellness Factor Clinic
Priceline Compounding Pharmacy
4/151 Glynburn Road, GLYNE SA
T: +61 8 8361 2999

The Wellness Oasis
49 Portrush Road, Payneham SA 5070
T: +61 8 8362 8444
Special Interests: Nutritional Medicine, Prolotherapy, IV Therapies, Chelation, BHRT, Anti-Ageing Medicine

19 Hampton Road, Hawthorn SA 5062
T: +61 8 8272 2140

â�ºback to top


Scarborough Beach Medical Centre
37 Scarborough Beach Road, Scarborough WA 6019
T: +61 8 93418300
Special Interests: Anti-Ageing Medicine, Menopause, Perimenopause, Women’s Health, Male Menopause, Thyroid, Lifestyle Medicine, Cosmetic Medicine – Botox, Fillers, PRP, Acne Scar Treatment, Liquid Facelifts

Mount Pleasant Wellness Centre
36 Gibson Street, Mount Pleasant WA 6153
T: +61 8 9364 9985
Special Interests: Anti-Ageing Medicine, BHRT, Chronic Fatigue, Nutritional & Environmental Medicine. Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Intravenous Therapy, Women’s and Men’s Health

Perth Natural Medicine Clinic
361 Lord Street, Perth WA 6000
T: +61 8 9328 9233
Special Interests: Nutritional Medicine, Hormone Imbalances, Weight Management, Bio-impedance Analysis

â�ºback to top


Bradford Cosmedical
Suite 2, Clifford Place
25 Isabel Street, Toowoomba QLD 4350
T: +61 7 4639 1250
Special Interests: Male & Female Hormones, Anti-Ageing Medicine, Preventative Health, Gene Testing

Bayside Acupuncture Chiropractic & Natural Therapies
8/92-98 Pease St, Manunda QLD 4870
T: +61 7 4032 1977

Terry White Windsor
142 Newmarket Rd, Windsor QLD 4030
T: +61 7 3857 5666

77 Woodward Street, Edge Hill, Cairns, QLD 4870
T: +61 7 4032 1338
Special Interests: Integrative Medicine, Nutrition Medicine, Natural Hormone Supplementation including the Wiley Protocol

Shop 14 Runaway Bay Shopping Village, Runaway Bay, QLD 4216
T: +07 5537 5888
Special Interests: Cardiovasc metabolic medicine, weight loss, BHRT, Skin cancer

396 Stanley Road, Carina QLD 4152
T: +61 7 3398 8188

â�ºback to top


146 Weld Street, Beaconsfield TAS 7270
T: +61 3 6383 1511

â�ºback to top


O2 Health
9 Humphry Drive, Christchurch, New Zealand
T: +64 0396 80202
Special Interests: Nutrition, Chelation, Anti-Ageing Medicine

Karanga Health Centre
116 Owen Street, Wellington, New Zealand 6021
T: +64 04 389 0800

Village Medical
2A Dodson Avenue, Milford, New Zealand
T: +64 9486 0030
Special Interests: Longevity Medicine, Illness Prevention, OH&S Medicine, Stress-related Illness, Hormones and Menopause

Ohope Beach Medical Centre
262 Pohutukawa Avenue, Ohope New Zealand 3121
T: +64 07312 5340
Special Interests: Anti-Ageing Medicine

Pharmaceutical Compounding NZ Ltd.
PO Box 101-142 North Shore Mail Centre New Zealand 0745
T: +64 02148 5901

MARK WEBSTER BPharm RegPharmNZ AACNEM Diplomate ABAAHP Diplomate
Stay Well Pharmacy
27 Shands Road, Hornby, Christchurch, New Zealand, 8042
T: +64 3349 8785
Special Interests: Anti-Ageing and evidence-based Nutritional Medicine for health, Hormone Imbalances, Menstrual Irregularities, Low Thyroid Function. Mental Health. Chronic Fatigue.

Nutri-Med Health Ltd.
5 Penning Road, Milford, North Shore City New Zealand 0620
T: +64 09410 2647
Special Interests: Anti-Ageing and evidence-based Nutritional Medicine for health, Hormone Imbalances, Menstrual Irregularities, Low Thyroid Function

â�ºback to top


Raffles Medical
585 North Bridge Road, Raffles Hospital Singapore 188770
T: +65 6311 2340

Younger by Design
Room 1603, 16/F Century Square
1-13 D’aguilar, Central Hong Kong
T: +852 3691 8834
Special Interests: Anti-Ageing Medicine

Drs Jiten & Caroline Medical Centre and X-Ray
10 Jalan Serene #02-01 Serene Centre, Singapore 258748
T: +65 6466 6808
Special Interests: Menopause, Andropause, Leaky Gut & Liver Detox, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Regen Medical Centre (Macau) 14A Macau Square, Macau
704 Takshing House 20 Des Voeux Road, Central Hong Kong
T: +853 2828 2202
T: +852 2522 5571




Dr Kathy O’Sullivan  Stafford Rd –

Dr John Ryan at Aspley Medical Centre

Dr James at Carseldine Medical Centre


Also Check:


NIIM – National Institute of Integrative Medicine

Choosing an integrative GP



Integrative Medicine Practitioners in Australia


India Holds Bill Gates Accountable For His Vaccine Crimes

October 5, 2014

As Bill Gates faces a lawsuit for the illegal testing of tribal children in India, it appears that his crimes against humanity have finally caught up with him.

A recent report published by Health Impact News has reported that the Gates Foundation has found itself facing a pending lawsuit, due to an investigation that is being carried out by the Supreme Courts of India.

Health Impact News stated:

“While fraud and corruption are revealed on almost a daily basis now in the vaccine industry, the U.S. mainstream media continues to largely ignore such stories. Outside the U.S., however, the vaccine empires are beginning to crumble, and English versions of the news in mainstream media outlets are available via the Internet.

One such country is India, where the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and their vaccine empire are under fire, including a pending lawsuit currently being investigated by the India Supreme Court.”[1]

The Health Impact News article centered largely on a four-page report that was recently published by Economic Times India.

Eager to know more, I investigated their story and discovered that the World Health Organization, the Gates Foundation and two organizations funded by them, PATH (Program for Appropriate Technology in Health) and GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization), have found themselves under fire, after a writ of petition originally submitted to the Supreme Court of India, by Kalpana Mehta, Nalini Bhanot and Dr. Rukmini Rao in 2012, was finally heard by the courts.

The petitioners submitting the petition stated:

“BMGF, PATH and WHO were criminally negligent trialling the vaccines on a vulnerable, uneducated and under-informed population school administrators, students and their parents who were not provided informed consent or advised of potential adverse effects or required to be monitored post-vaccination.” [2]


Young Tribal Girls Tested With HPV Vaccines

The Economic Times India published their report August 2014. They stated that in 2009, tests had been carried out on 16,000 tribal school children in Andhra Pradesh, India, using the human papiloma virus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil.

According to the report written by KP Narayana Kumar, within a month of receiving the vaccine, many of the children fell ill and by 2010, five of them had died. A further two children were reported to have died in Vadodara, Gujarat, where an estimated 14,000 tribal children were vaccinated with another brand of the HPV vaccine, Cervarix, manufactured by GlaxoSmitheKline (GSK).

Shockingly, the report stated that many of the consent forms used to vaccinate the girls were signed “illegally,” either by the wardens from the hostels where many of the girls resided, or using thumbprints from illiterate parents.

This travesty was not discovered until a team of health activists from the non-government organization SAMA, an organization specializing in women’s health, decided to investigate what had been going on.

According to the report, they were shocked to discover that a total of 120 girls had been taken ill, suffering from a variety of symptoms, including “epileptic seizures, severe stomach aches, headaches and mood swings.”

The Economic Times stated:

“The Sama report also said there had been cases of early onset of menstruation following the vaccination, heavy bleeding and severe menstrual cramps among many students. The standing committee pulled up the relevant state governments for the shoddy investigation into these deaths.

It said it was disturbed to find that ‘all the seven deaths were summarily dismissed as unrelated to vaccinations without in-depth investigations …’ the speculative causes were suicides, accidental drowning in well (why not suicide?), malaria, viral infections, subarachnoid hemorrhage (without autopsy) etc.”

This information is even more shocking when you discover that the organization funding the study was none other than the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who declared the project a total success.

Kumar wrote:

“According to the BMGF, the WHO, the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and the Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India have all recommended vaccination ‘as a proven and highly effective preventive measure for cervical cancer.’ The project used vaccines that are licensed in India and that have been administered safely around the world tens of millions of times, preventing countless cases of cervical cancer illness and death, ‘maintains a BMGF spokesperson in an emailed response (see GAVI & PHFI create incentives …’”

He continued:

“BMGF’s role in funding the controversial studies, however, has led to many healthcare activists in India voicing their apprehensions. ‘BMGF has to take full responsibility because PATH is funded by them. It is also unethical when people championing the cause of vaccines are the same ones who are also investing in vaccine development,’ said V Rukmini Rao, one of the activists who filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court in connection with the HPV vaccine studies.” [3]

Absolutely, and this is not the first time that these organizations have been caught illegally testing vaccines in developing countries.

Gates Foundation, WHO, PATH, GAVI, UNICEF Behind Chad Vaccine Disaster

In December 2012, in the small village of Gouro, Chad, Africa, situated on the edge of the Sahara Desert, five hundred children were locked into their school, threatened that if they did not agree to being force-vaccinated with a meningitis A vaccine, they would receive no further education.

These children were vaccinated without their parents’ knowledge. This vaccine was an unlicensed product still going through the third and fourth phases of testing.

Within hours, one hundred and six children began to suffer from headaches, vomiting, severe uncontrollable convulsions and paralysis. The children’s wait for a doctor began. They had to wait one full week for a doctor to arrive while the team of vaccinators proceeded to vaccinate others in the village.

When the doctor finally came, he could do nothing for the children. The team of vaccinators, upon seeing what had happened, fled the village in fear.

The original report written in a small, local newspaper called La Voix, the only newspaper to have published the original story, stated that forty children were finally transferred to a hospital in Faya and later taken by plane to two hospitals in N’Djamena, the capital city of Chad.

Link to VacTruth Article

After being shuttled around like cattle, many of these sick, weak children were finally dumped back in their village without a diagnosis and each family was given an unconfirmed sum of £1000 by the government. No forms were signed and no documentation was seen. They were informed that their children had not suffered a vaccine injury.

However, if this were true, why would their government award each family £1000 in what has been described as hush money?

The only mainstream news channel to have highlighted the plight of these poor children was a local channel called Tchad, which filmed footage of the then-Prime Minister of Chad visiting the children in hospital.

VacTruth has copies of both reports, along with medical and government documents.

Despite this evidence and VacTruth’s detailed and extensive coverage, including highlighting television footage, once again, the vaccine program was hailed a success. To watch videos reporting the story, see the references at the end of this article. [4] [5]

The groups involved with this project were PATH, WHO, UNICEF, and the Gates Foundation. During investigations, it was discovered that the whole project was being run by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

In a press release, the Gates Foundation stated:

“MenAfriVac is a tremendous success story for the global health community. It is the first vaccine developed specifically for Africa, and it proves that global partnerships can develop and deliver high-quality, low-cost vaccines.

Ten years ago, we invested in the Meningitis Vaccine Project,  an innovative model that brought together PATH, the World Health Organization, African health ministers and the Serum Institute of India today, we celebrate the result: a modern vaccine selling for less than US 50 cents per dose with the potential to end Africa’s deadly meningitis epidemics.

We believe that vaccines are one of the best buys in global health. In January, Bill and Melinda Gates called on the global community to make this the Decade of Vaccines. There is no better way to launch this decade than with a new vaccine that will improve and save lives.” [6]

VacTruth can prove otherwise.

Government Inquiry Holds GAVI Accountable for Multiple Deaths

Despite the fact the Gates Foundation call vaccines “one of the best buys in global health,” a government inquiry in Pakistan has found the complete opposite.

In 2011, the Express Tribune published a story stating that:

“ISLAMABAD: A government inquiry has found that polio vaccines for infants funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunisation are causing deaths and disabilities in regional countries including Pakistan.

The startling revelation is part of an inquiry report prepared by the Prime Minister’s Inspection Commission (PMIC) on the working of the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). The PMIC, headed by Malik Amjad Noon, has recommended that Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani immediately suspend the administration of all types of vaccines funded by the GAVI.”

According to the Express Tribune, the main vaccinations in question were the polio vaccine and the 5-in-1 pentavelent vaccine, which were said to be responsible for the deaths and disability of a number of children in Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Japan.

The vaccines were funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunization (GAVI) an organization financed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Program, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, the Rockefeller Foundation, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank.

Writing on the official report, made exclusive to the newspaper, the Express Tribune stated:

“The report states, ‘The procured vaccines are not tested in laboratories to confirm their efficacy and genuineness. This leaves room for use of spurious and counterfeit vaccines.’” [7] (emphasis added)

If this is true, then once again the Gates Foundation has been linked to mass vaccination initiatives using untested, unsafe vaccinations.

The Gates Foundation and WHO Labeled Unethical by Medical Experts

In 2012, Ramesh Shankar Mumbai, an author writing for the Pharmabiz website, reported that two medical experts from India had accused the Gates Foundation and WHO of being unethical.

In his report, Mumbai stated that Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel of the Department of Pediatrics at St. Stephens Hospital in Delhi, wrote the following information in their report in the April issue of Indian Journal of Medical Ethics.

“It was unethical for WHO and Bill Gates to flog this program when they knew 10 years back that it was never to succeed. Getting poor countries to expend their scarce resources on an impossible dream over the last 10 years was unethical.” reported that Dr. Vashisht and Dr. Puliyel had continued their report by stating:

“Another major ethical issue raised by the campaign is the failure to thoroughly investigate the increase in the incidence of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) in areas where many doses of vaccine were used. NPAFP is clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly.” continued:

“The authors noted that while India was polio-free in 2011, in the same year, there were 47500 cases of NPAFP. While data from India’s National Polio Surveillance Project showed NPAFP rate increased in proportion to the number of polio vaccine doses received, independent studies showed that children identified with NPAFP ‘were at more than twice the risk of dying than those with wild polio infection.’” [8]

The corruption and deceit by these organizations does not stop there.

The Gates Foundation Blamed for 10,000 Vaccine-Related Deaths

In 2013, yet another report named the Gates Foundation and GAVI as being responsible for multiple deaths using untested vaccinations on children from the developing world.

The report, published on the website Occupy Corporatism and written by Susanne Posel stated:

“It was found out through an investigation, that GAVI was using an untested vaccine; giving this dangerous vaccine to Pakistani children shows the lack of empathy associated with these organizations.

GAVI was blamed for the deaths of 10,000 children in Pakistan when they came in and administered polio vaccines that resulted in casualties.” [9]

As we know, GAVI is heavily funded by the Gates Foundation. [10]

So, what was the name of the organization that investigated GAVI and found them using untested polio vaccinations in Pakistan?

According to the Express Tribune article, which I referred to earlier in this article, it was none other than the Indian government, who, upon discovering the shocking truth, recommended the immediate suspension of the administration of all types of vaccines funded by GAVI. [7]

In a recent radio show hosted by Sallie O. Elkordy, Susanne Posel gave her frank and honest views on the whole sorry mess that we find ourselves in today.

Warning: This report is not for the faint-hearted. [11]


It is difficult to believe that, despite the mounting evidence outlining the many crimes against humanity that have been committed by the Gates Foundation, GAVI, UNICEF and PATH, Bill Gates is portrayed as a hero among many.

However, according to the definition of hero in the Oxford Dictionary, the word hero means:

“A person, typically a man, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.” [12]

The dictionary I used said nothing about vaccinating innocent, vulnerable children with untested and unsafe vaccinations, causing them to suffer agonizing, untimely deaths.

Freedom Of Choice – No Jab No Pay/Play Petitions Australia

Urgent Action Alert – please do this now!

Oppressed by a majorityAs you have most likely heard, the Abbot government has stated that they will remove both the Family Tax Benefit Part A supplement and the Childcare benefits from any family who does not vaccinate their children fully according to the current Australian Childhood schedule. The opposition is in full support of these changes which, it is estimated, can cost Australian families with two children up to $30,000 per year.

The AVN believes that these moves are illegal and unconstitutional and is in absolute opposition to them.

We need all Australians who believe in freedom of health choice – whether you vaccinate fully, selectively or not at all – to immediately call as well as send a very brief email to your local members of Federal Parliament (you can find their details at this link) and also to the following 3 people:

The Hon Tony Abbott, Prime Minister of Australia
Level 2, 17 Sydney Road
Manly, NSW, 2095
Telephone:(02) 9977 6411
Fax:(02) 9977 8715

The Hon Bill Shorten, Leader of the Opposition
PO Box 214
Moonee Ponds Vic 3039
Tel: (03) 9326 1300
Fax: (03) 9326 0611

The Hon Scott Morrison, Minister for Social Services
PO Box 1306
Cronulla, NSW, 2230
Telephone:(02) 9523 0339
Fax:(02) 9523 8959

All you need to say is the following:

I do not support the “No Jab, No Pay” reforms which are proposed to be enacted into law. I do support freedom of health choice and will vote accordingly in up-coming local, federal and state elections.

If you call, give them your name and if you write, be sure to sign your name and include your contact details.

If you can send these letters by post, that is powerful. If you can’t, please email (using the contact form links above) or fax (or both) but whatever you do, do it today!

We are also asking for pledges for a potential court challenge should the government proceed with this legislation. We will not be charging anyone until we have the means (or necessity) to fight this, but if you would like to help support health rights in Australia, please click here to make a pledge.

To read more about these moves from a very pro-vaccination, anti-health choice page, click here to read the Daily Telegraph’s take on what is happening. There is also a poll on this page asking if you think it is right to financially penalise parents who don’t vaccinate. It would be great if you could vote in that poll.

It is important that we maintain and re-establish our right to choice.

Our right to refuse vaccination.

Vaccines come with a risk of injury and death, and there’s no liability for the medical doctors or the pharmaceutical companies. In this situation it should definitely be a choice.

Federal Member for Bonner, Ross Vasta, today said the conscientious objector exemption on children’s vaccination for access to taxpayer funded Child Care Benefits, the Child Care Rebate and the Family Tax Benefit Part A end of year supplement will cease from 1 January 2016.

By signing this petition you are helping Australian’s keep their right to
use the conscientious objector exemption and refuse to be injected vaccinations without recourse of being denied education, health care or parenting payments.

Changes to the NSW Public Health Act (Part 5, Division 4, Sections 85-88) and NSW Public Health Regulation (Part 7, Division 2, Sections 42-44A) are unethical, and people have the right to refuse to be injected something into their body.

Abbott said in a joint statement with Social Services Minister Scott Morrison “The choice made by families not to immunise their children is not supported by public policy or medical research, nor should such action be supported by taxpayers in the form of childcare payments.”

TRANSPARENCY CHALLENGE and Vaccine Confidence – Australian Government and Decision Makers.

We, the undersigned, regardless of our personal stance on vaccination, do not believe that any leader or decision-maker, in control of their full intellectual capacity and understanding, could read, nor have they read, all recent submissions made to parliament; including anecdotal, legal and scientific research, and subsequently agree to passing the No Jab No Pay law with full confidence.

Furthermore, those individuals as listed below, once fully compliant with this demand, will then be required to provide proof that they have not been affected in any way, with adverse events, vaccine injury or death.

Notwithstanding the outright dismissal of :

  • Article 18 in the Australian Constitution (coercion and bribery are illegal), and the confidentiality of an individual’s health records is no longer considered.
  • Coercion and bribery taking place by removing Family Tax A – with end of year payment ending for ALL parents in 2017 whether they are vaccinated or not (Report here).
  • Lack of privacy and open disclosure now extends to adults as well as children
  • Documented research effects proving link between vaccination and chronic neurological damage to seniors along with Indigenous (See here) and armed service personnel (See here).

– We believe the No Jab Law is a breach of Constitutional regulations, thereby illegal so should be held null and void – at least until such a time that the decision-makers prove to us the efficacy and safety of 100%, and subsequently change the Constitution.


We the undersigned challenge the decision makers and stakeholders – namely the following (including all family members):

  • All Government representatives and leaders
  • All Education leaders (principals) refusing enrolment of non vaccinated
  • All Child Care leaders refusing enrolment of non vaccinated
  • All Media representatives – entire Murdoch family, TV, radio, magazine, newspaper publishers, editors, journalists
  • All doctors and pharmacists
  • All oncology staff and child health staff
  • All pharmaceutical researchers and scientists from vaccine manufacturing companies
  • As representatives of the Australian public, the entire Royal family

– bearing in mind all following references, to undertake the following with full transparency :

  • Full catch-up vaccination, based upon dosage according to individual bodyweight – approximately 10 x infant dosage of every scheduled vaccination on the Australian Immunisation Register for adults.
  • All vaccinations documented on film for physical proof.

We also challenge all listed above to compulsorily read and note the following references, in full –

  • Paralegal Maureen Hickman’s research contained in ‘Vaccination, The Right Choice?’ found here
  • Indigenous deaths and gene mutations according to Dr Archie Kalokerinos’ research in Every Second Child.
  • Every Australian Immunisation Schedule full practitioner package insert – these should also be available to every individual prior to all vaccinations at least one week before administration of any vaccination so that all agreeing parents and individuals are compliant with facts and notice signed and witnessed to accept ALL facts have been disclosed in full.

As our leaders so openly and wholeheartedly support vaccinations, catch up vaccinations and ultimately blanket compulsory vaccinations, we demand to be led by example, with full transparency by all involved,without protection from liability. Once this is shown publicly via all media outlets to be effective, then we will agree to discuss the demands.

Until this time –

  • Media will refrain from constant vaccination propaganda headlines and stories.
  • Print media will publish IN FULL, all practitioner-provided vaccine package insert details of possible side effects and ingredients – full transparency, clear enough for any parent to read, regardless of level of education.
  • Family Payments and Child Care Benefits will remain as they are.
  • School enrolments and registrations, and Child Care placements will remain as they are.
  • No-Vax Childcare centres be free to open with full support offered to existing centres – and remain legal and unpunished ongoing.
  • All vaccines given from this point be done so with a signed certificate from all administrators of every vaccine AND with a doctor’s signature as witnessed at the time of vaccination – advising that parent has been provided with full practitioner package insert documentation.
  • All vaccine ingredients – hidden and documented, MUST be advised and LABELLED. As there is some proof in existence that mercury, aluminium, aborted fœtal cell lines, peanut oil and such ingredients are not being advised or labelled, transparency must begin immediately.

– All without hindrance or punishment. Furthermore, active social media infiltrators and agitators now targeting bereaved families, practitioners and others who do not conform to the No Jab No Pay rules will be considered to be breaking the law and must remain inactive until such a time that this is completed.

If in the event the outcome lies in the favour of the new No Jab law and every individual as listed above is fully vaccinated without adverse effects, in the (purported) rare incidence of vaccine injury for members of the public, records will be made public and both manufacturing companies/doctors and the Government will accept full liability.

We don’t want an adult vaccination register in Australia

In the May budget, Tony Abbott announced that we are going to expand our current childhood vaccination register into an adult register, starting in September 2016. Are we going to have so many new vaccinations for adults that we need a register to keep track of these things? Are pensions, tax returns and other types government support going to become dependent on having ALL the recommended vaccines?

Won’t happen? Well it’s already being done ……

Childhood vaccination used to be recommended but voluntary, much like adult vaccination is at the moment. Then in 1994 the childhood register was introduced to ‘monitor and improve’ vaccination rates. Vaccination was incentivised with the $250 Maternity Immunisation Allowance. Later this was changed to Family Tax Benefit part A supplement, worth over $2100. All this, while the number of vaccines required increased.

Now Abbott is going to abolish your right to conscientious objection and religious objection to all the vaccines currently on the immunisation schedule and ALL FUTURE ONES. This is an important point, as this does not just take away our right if we do not agree with current vaccinations but all future ones that the government chooses. The Australian Medical Association President, Brian Owler said ‘they would closely monitor if the new (No Jab No Pay) measures have a significant impact and may even advocate for stricter national rules, like mandatory vaccinations to attend school in the future’.

Such forceful action must be in response to major problem. Right ?

Childhood vaccination rates are the highest in our history. The 2 year old cohort is currently at 91%. Contrast this where vaccination rates for 2 years old were 89% in 2003, 73 % in 1999 and an estimated 53% in the 1980’s. (Sources: Australian Childhood Immunisation Register & Australian Bureau of Statistics)

Let me tell you where the problem is?

In 1986, the United States passed a law that stopped any pharmaceutical company from being sued for any adverse outcome from their vaccines. Instead a tax was put on every vaccine and this is used to compensate adverse vaccine reactions. Contrast this for example, with the fines and compensation paid out by Merck for Vioxx (See figures from link – Vioxx Lawsuit – How to File, Settlements & Assistance for Your Claim

So from a business point of view, vaccines are a very lucrative product line. From here we have seen an explosion in medical products delivered through the vaccine model. There are over 250 new vaccines in development.

The adult vaccination market is a hugely untapped market. Only about a 30% uptake. But the market is estimated to be $100 billion by 2025. ( check figures here –

With the enormous financial interests involved in the development and marketing of drugs and medical devices, government policy is being manipulated to favour needs of the industry over that of the patient / public. A recent study concluded that “to serve its interests, the (medical and pharmaceutical) industry masterfully influences evidence-base production, evidence synthesis, understanding of harms issues, cost-effectiveness evaluations, clinical practice guidelines and healthcare professional education and also exerts direct influences on professional decisions and health consumers.” . ‘(Undue industry influence that distorts healthcare research, strategy, expenditure and practice

However, in Australia we don’t have have a vaccine injury compensation scheme. Instead, if vaccines are coerced just short of the point of being compulsory – then the consequences fall to the individual (that is, their affected health and the pursuit of legal redress).

What if the Australian government made the product compulsory in every way but name!?!? No marketing costs. No liability. How do they do this? Take the rights away from the people to choose what goes into their bodies now and into the future. This has already started with some professions mandating vaccines for employment – but you could always choose not to pursue that employment (if you can afford to)! It is a slippery slope that we are already on and this process of adult vaccine coercion all starts with ‘monitoring’ vaccine coverage using the Adult Vaccination Register.

This affects all Australians! We need to stand up and fight for our rights to have control over our bodies! We need to take action and now! Sign this petition. Share it widely. Write to your MP. The only right that can be removed are the ones you let be taken away!

Note: This petition does not meet parliamentary requirements. To send Tony Abbott and his ’team’ a ‘strong’ message that this is unpopular, we need BIG numbers.

The AUSTRALIAN VICTORIAN STATE GOVERNMENT’S NO JAB NO PLAY Legislation needs to be either abolished or amended to provide for an exemption for conscientious objection to the immunisation requirement on philosophical or religious grounds, in accordance with the obligations imposed by Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006, other human rights instruments to which Australia is a party, and to eliminate conflict between this Bill and the Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA) and A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act. A statutory declaration made by a child’s parents or legal guardians to the effect they have a conscientious objection to immunisation on philosophical or religious grounds should be sufficient to satisfy the immunisation requirement due to the difficulties in obtaining a signed objection form from a doctor.

THE NO JAB NO PLAY Victorian Legislation exceeds the power of Parliament which extends to making exclusions in outbreak conditions only. This legislation conflicts with sections 5 & 6 of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) 1992 and section 6 of the New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act (FFA) 1999. Refusal to allow a child to enroll in child care because of vaccination status amounts to unlawful discrimination under the DDA, and exposes child care centres to legal liability for acts of unlawful discrimination. In the DDA unvaccinated children are considered disabled and are thus protected from discrimination as disabled people. Section 48 of the Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act dealing with discrimination against those with an infectious disease will not hold up in court as it would be difficult to prove refusing to enrol an unvaccinated child in child care on the basis the child may catch a disease in the future is reasonably necessary to protect public health.

The Legislation conflicts with the FFA by denying a benefit conferred by that Act, namely the right to access subsidised childcare services (child care benefits). While eligibility to child care benefits under the FAA is subject to an immunisation requirement, exemptions from this requirement is permitted on the grounds of conscientious objection.

The Legislation conflicts with section 3.5 of Australia’s Medical Board Code of Conduct which says a person must be properly informed and be allowed to make a voluntary decision about whether they adopt any proposed medical care (Subsection 2 requires that a doctor obtains informed consent prior to providing a treatment), by coercing their decision with the threat of removing child care, which will threaten the parents ability to participate in work.

Professor Raina Macintyre recently expressed the concern that doctors were prevented from accepting consent under such circumstances in relation to a proposed immunisation requirement in Commonwealth laws.

“In addition, doctors must obtain valid consent to vaccinate children, and consent is not valid in the presence of any form of coercion.”

This obviously raises questions about the legal validity of the Bill particularly in the absence of provision for immunisation exemptions on conscientious grounds.

This Bill violates Section 8, subsections 2 and 3 of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (CHRR) which protects the right of every person to enjoy their human rights free of discrimination, and to equal and effective protection from discrimination by the law.

If deliberately unvaccinated children are claimed to pose a risk to the other children and staff, then by necessity, similarly unprotected children and people must also pose the same risk. These include:

(a) those who can’t be vaccinated for medical reasons; and

(b) those who are too young to have been vaccinated; and

(c) those who have been vaccinated, but who are not protected due to not producing the required biological response claimed to confer immunity; and

(d) those who were not vaccinated in utero; and

(e) child care centre employees.
If unvaccinated children are alleged to pose a risk to others then surely children receiving live virus vaccines would also pose a risk, but the Bill does not discriminate against these children on such a basis. Only deliberately unvaccinated children are singled out for exclusion.

Section 10, subsection c, of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (CHRR) protects the right to give free and full consent to a medical treatment. The immunisation requirement of this Bill will limit this right.

Vaccination like all medical procedures, carries with it the risk of death, disability and chronic disease. The tragic examples of Saba Button, Lachlan Neylan, Izzy Olesen and Ashley Epapara are cases in point. Both Saba Button and Lachlan Neylan suffered major brain injuries resulting in severe and permanent disability from the vaccinations they received. Izzy Olesen suffered Stevens Johnson Syndrome resulting in blindness and major skin scarring, and regrettably, Ashley Epapara died. You can read their stories at the

following links.

(Rule, 2011, Saba Button, the girl who is never alone, Perth Now)

(Hansen, 2013,Toddler who was given an adult flu shot is left severely brain-injured and unable to walk, Daily


(Olesen, 2014, Izzy’s Story, Vaccination Information Network)

(ABC News, 2010, Flu Vaccine can’t be ruled out in toddler’s death)

Importantly, unlike a medical procedure performed on a sick or injured person for therapeutic goals, vaccination is a medical procedure performed on healthy people for a potential future benefit. For this reason, the standard of informed consent to the procedure should be arguably higher than that for a therapeutic purpose, and most definitely should only be given freely, without coercion.

This Legislation needs to be abolished or amended to provide for an exemption for conscientious objection to the immunisation requirement on philosophical or religious grounds, in accordance with the obligations imposed by Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006, other human rights instruments to which Australia is a party, and to eliminate conflict between this Bill and the Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA) and A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act. A statutory declaration made by a child’s parents or legal guardians to the effect they have a conscientious objection to immunisation on philosophical or religious grounds should be sufficient to satisfy the immunisation requirement due to the difficulties in obtaining a signed objection form from a doctor.

For more reasons why at the least this Bill needs amending please read all of the following document here



As parents it is our duty to make decisions for our children that we believe are best for them, especially when it comes to optional medical interventions like vaccinations. This is a choice that is not taken lightly and parents must make this choice without coercion or manipulation, as stated on the Government’s own website:

“For consent to be legally valid, the following elements must be present:

  • It must be given by a person with legal capacity, and of sufficient intellectual capacity to understand the implications of being vaccinated.
  • It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation.
  • It must cover the specific procedure that is to be performed.
  • It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, risks of not having it and any alternative options have been explained to the individual.”

By trying to take away family and childcare payments away from low income families who conscientiously choose to selectively vaccinate or not vaccinate, you are putting them in the impossible position of having to choose between feeding and housing their families and vaccinating their children against their will, THIS IS NOT LEGAL CONSENT, IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND IT IS BLACKMAIL!

If any of these children are injured or killed because their parents have been forced to vaccinate under duress, is the Government ready to be legally responsible? Especially as there is no vaccine injury compensation scheme in Australia.

Stop using Whooping Cough rates as an excuse to attack conscientious objectors and start looking at the real problem, the vaccine.

In 1991 <71% of Australian children were fully vaccinated and there were only 347 cases of Whooping Cough, while in 2011 with 90% of children vaccinated, we had 38,751 cases an increase of over 11,000%! How can you blame the 1.8% of unvaccinated children in 2015?

The vaccinated can become asymptomatic transmitters of Whooping Cough and infect young infants, while the dominant strain of Whooping Cough is not even targeted by the vaccine. A study has also linked the Whooping cough outbreaks to vaccinated children and adolescents.

If raising already high vaccination rates is the purpose of this part of the legislation and the wealthy areas of Australia have the lowest rates, then how does targeting low income families change the vaccination rates of high income families?

We have seen children who have been injured or killed after vaccination in Australia, like Saba Button, Ashley Epapara and Lachlan Neyland and the hundreds of children rushed to hospital during the Fluvax debacle of 2009 . By bringing in punishments for families who choose not to vaccinate you are saying that these children are acceptable collateral damage and that they have less value than children injured or killed by diseases, how would you feel if this was your child?

Our children deserve better than a one size fits all approach to health care, especially when the healthcare products are being produced by a multi-billion dollar industry with a long and sordid history of fraud and deceptive practices. Just look at the industry whistle-blowers who have courageously come out to testify of this fact, such as Dr William Thompson PhD, Dr’s Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski and the revelations of Peter Gøtzsche from the Cochrane Collaboration.

If there is a risk there MUST be a choice, ALL parents have the RIGHT and the duty to decide WHICH risk is acceptable to their own families!


Pertussis notifications from 1991-2013 NNDSS

Pertussis vaccination rates for 2011$FILE/cdi3704a.pdf

Pertussis Vaccination rates in 1990-2001

Whooping cough resurgence due to vaccinated people not knowing they’re infectious?

Whooping cough increase related to current vaccine


The Australian Vaccination-skeptics Network, Inc. (AVN), along with 140 other people, consequently made a submission to the Victorian Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee, whose role it is to scrutinise all bills introduced to the Victorian Parliament for compliance with sound legislative practice, and in accordance with The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (the charter). Under the charter, the Committee is required to determine whether a Bill introduced into Parliament is incompatible with human rights protected under that Act. This submission is available at the following link on the AVN’s website.

The AVN’s submission identified several human rights which are significantly limited by this Bill, and provided evidence to the committee that these limitations of human rights were not reasonably justified having regard to the Bill’s stated purpose of increasing vaccination rates in Victoria, and that there were less restrictive means by which the government may increase vaccination rates without infringing the human rights of conscientious objectors.

These arguments seem to have resonated with the committee, which reported its findings on the Bill last week, and which is available at the following link commencing on page 7 (Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (No Jab, No Play) Bill 2015).

The findings can be summarised as follows.

1) The Bill’s immunisation requirement may constitute direct or indirect discrimination on the basis of imputation of possible future disease in contravention of the charter. However, the committee failed to note that the Bill may also conflict with the Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act for similar reasons.

“The Committee will write to the Minister seeking further information as to whether or not new section 143B’s ban on the enrolment of most unvaccinated children in early childhood services is compatible with the Charter’s rights against direct or indirect discrimination on the basis of possible future disease.” (page 9)

2) The Bill’s provision for a temporary grace period of 16 weeks by which to comply with the immunisation requirement in relation to children of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent may constitute discrimination on the basis of race in contravention of the charter.

“The Committee will write to the Minister seeking further information as to whether or not new section 143C(1)(d)’s exemption of all Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders from this requirement is a measure taken for the purpose of assisting or advancing persons or groups disadvantaged by discrimination.” (page 9)

3) The Bill’s immunisation requirement without exemptions on grounds of conscientious objection constitutes an effective mandate for those Victorian parents reliant on child care services in contravention of the charter which protects the right to consent freely to medical treatment.

“However, the Committee notes that a parent who is unable to care for a child themselves (for example due to employment or other commitments) and cannot afford or otherwise obtain private care for their child (for example from a family member or a nanny) may have no choice other than to have his or her child vaccinated in order to enrol that child in an early childhood service.” (page 10)

The committee also noted that the Bill will have the effect of denying Commonwealth child care benefits which are currently available to defray the significant cost of child care services.

The Committee called on Parliament to consider whether there is a less restrictive alternative which is reasonably available to increase vaccination rates even though the AVN’s submission provided evidence about how vaccination rates could be increased without infringing the rights of conscientious objectors.

4) In relation to the AVN’s argument that the Bill limited the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief which is protected by the charter, the committee noted that an immunisation requirement to enrol children in childcare services in New South Wales provides for exemptions on such grounds, but made no recommendation to adopt such an exemption.

Notwithstanding, the committee’s damning findings about this draconian and totalitarian Bill, the Legislative Assembly proceeded to pass this Bill last Thursday following debate, and the word ‘debate’ has been used loosely. The only debate seemed to be around the Bill not being draconian enough because it provides for a temporary grace period for disadvantaged groups. For those wishing to read the various speeches by ALP, LNP and Greens members, the links to Hansard are provided below, but brace yourselves; it’s chock full of just about every pro-vaccine fallacy of which one could think. The table of contents makes it easy to find the relevant sections.      

What this means is that the Bill is now before the upper house (Legislative Council) which resumes sitting next Tuesday 20 October 2015, so time is running out if we are to defeat this Bill. People in Victoria who wish to retain their freedom of choice need to stand up now, and should be contacting their state representatives to voice their objection to the Bill by highlighting to them the damning findings of the parliamentary committee: that the Bill is discriminatory; violates the right to consent freely to a medical procedure and; that there are less restrictive means by which the government may increase immunisation rates without discriminating against those opposed to vaccination.

The AVN has compiled some tips for those meeting with or writing to Victorian MPs. These can be found at the following link.




Chicken pox – ‘pox party’ or forced immunity?

I am frequently asked about chicken pox, usually because the person asking is alarmed my children are not vaccinated and somehow pose a mystery threat, carrying all the diseases for which they are not ‘protected’…

But recently I was pleasantly surprised because some people were planning a ‘pox party’ – something popular in the natural parenting world, but seen as one of the worst examples of parenting by those who still unfortunately have no idea about how immunity really works.

You see, ‘natural immunity’ can only be gained IF the individual is exposed to the original pathogen – such as Jenner originally discovered with cowpox – but took it to a whole eugenic level of murder and mystery. The vaccines in today’s world often have little to no pathogenic content; instead consisting of a deadly cocktail of chemicals and pharmaceutical ingredients which have nothing to do with say, chicken pox. Do you know the ingredients of a varicella vaccine? It should be ‘yukky’ instead of needing a degree in chemistry. Following ingredients are easily researched on Mercks’ website.

Rather than contain attenuated (diluted, reduced) contents of a chicken pox blister alone, according to the actual product packaging, what is being injected into your child is –

A weakened form of chickenpox virus
Sucrose (sugar)
Hydrolyzed gelatin (usually dried pork bones using unidentified enzymes)
Sodium chloride (salt)
Monosodium L-glutamate (flavour enhancer – high incidence of allergy/anaphylaxis triggers)
Potassium chloride – according to – available in small, balanced amounts in the body, however if introduced artificially – You should not use potassium chloride if you are allergic to it, or if you have certain conditions. Be sure your doctor knows if you have:
high levels of potassium in your blood (hyperkalemia);
kidney failure;
Addison’s disease (an adrenal gland disorder);
a large tissue injury such as a severe burn;
if you are severely dehydrated; or
if you are taking a “potassium-sparing” diuretic (water pill) such as amiloride (Midamor, Moduretic), spironolactone (Aldactone, Aldactazide), triamterene (Dyrenium, Dyazide, Maxzide).
“To make sure you can safely take potassium chloride, tell your doctor if you have any of these other conditions:

kidney disease;
heart disease or high blood pressure;
a blockage in your stomach or intestines; or
chronic diarrhea (such as ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease).
residual components of MRC-5 (human and guinea pig DNA)
sodium phosphate monobasic – an industrial chemical (thanks to – side effects include anaemia, diarrhoea, fever,nausea, vomiting, kidney damage
EDTA – a detoxification chemical
Neomycin – an antibiotic supposedly included to prevent the development of chickenpox
Fetal bovine serum – slaughtered calf blood serum
Phosphate dibasic – synthetic buffering reagent used to purify antibodies in laboratories – side effects include –
Constipation and upset stomach may occur. If any of these effects persist or worsen, tell your doctor or pharmacist promptly.

If your doctor has directed you to use this medication, remember that he or she has judged that the benefit to you is greater than the risk of side effects. Many people using this medication do not have serious side effects.

Tell your doctor immediately if any of these unlikely but serious side effects occur: nausea/vomiting, loss of appetite, unusual weight loss, mental/mood changes, bone/muscle pain, headache, increased thirst/urination, weakness, unusual tiredness.

A very serious allergic reaction to this drug is rare. However, seek immediate medical attention if you notice any symptoms of a serious allergic reaction, including: rash,itching/swelling (especially of the face/tongue/throat), severe dizziness, trouble breathing.

This is not a complete list of possible side effects. If you notice other effects not listed above, contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Potassium phosphate monobasic – an antifungal buffering reagent, highly acidic – side effects include –
Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, or headache may occur. If any of these effects persist or worsen, tell your doctor or pharmacist promptly.”

(Easily researched on Web MD)

“Tell your doctor immediately if any of these unlikely but serious side effects occur: bone/joint aches, muscle cramps, stomach pain.

Tell your doctor immediately if any of these rare but very serious side effects occur: confusion, fast/irregular heartbeat, unusual weakness, tingling/numbness of the hands/feet, change in the amount of urine.

A very serious allergic reaction to this drug is rare. However, seek immediate medical attention if you notice any symptoms of a serious allergic reaction, including: rash,itching/swelling (especially of the face/tongue/throat), severe dizziness, trouble breathing.”

Why tell your doctor – so he/she can give you another shot of poison for that? This is not a complete list of possible side effects. If you notice other effects not listed above, contact your doctor or pharmacist.

And as many batches of vaccines, contain ‘hotshots’ meaning there is no way to determine whether the one your child gets is the bad batch that is harming previously healthy infants, the above ingredients can be in a number of different amounts or variations.

Ask your GP or whoever is giving the shot, to list the ingredients they are about to give to your child – and ask what they are, and what side effects they will possibly present. I am yet to find one single medical expert able to do so. You will be told to expect mild symptoms supposedly caused by your child’s natural immunity being triggered. Yet it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that they are actually abnormal drug side effects. Imagine, your child having drug side effects that can cause anything from the ‘simplest’ fever or rash through to death!

Better still, get your GP or vaccine provider to sign this – THEY WONT

So, what about the pox party idea?

Most of the children in my extended family are not vaccinated (well, in my children’s generation, that is) and we all did this. Plus mum made sure we had measles and pox parties as kids as she didn’t fully trust the vaccines either. The ‘party’ is as simple as a sleep over or a few hours of playing together while the contagious child is most sick, that is 2 to 5 days after exposure. Once the rash is in full bloom the risk of contagiousness has usually passed. It’s odd, even government websites say MOST chickenpox is mild. So why expose our children to chemicals that can cause serious health concerns?

And what can you do to ensure your child is safe when they develop chicken pox? They are usually no more than a horribly itchy rash that makes you feel very miserable. Occasionally they have been reported to attack the nervous system or eyes or even internal organs. Compared to the dangers posed by the vaccine adjuvants (additives) the risk is minor and if monitored well, there is no reason for it to ever become so serious.

Really, do all you can to build natural immune response –

Probiotics to build the immunity from within
Fresh juices with garlic and ginger added – for example, orange, lemon, celery, apple, garlic, ginger, beetroot, pineapple
Herb-biotic – I also used a product called astraforte which is a Chinese ‘respiratory’ tonic but as you know, these labels are misleading to the public and generally, something used to build immunity and fight infection can usually be used throughout the body. It has a blend of astragalus, ganoderma and ligustrum – absolutely the best herb-biotic I have used. But if you don’t get Thompson’s range there, ask for any good herb biotic blend.
Bicarb baths are the absolute best to allay itching and acidic irritation
Calamine or any zinc application to soothe the skin
For any lesions that threaten to suppurate you can apply gentian violet and papaw ointment or hypericum ointment.
And if he should become very infectious, as in the lesions suppurate en masse as one of my girls’ did, you bathe in as hot a bath as he can bear, with a cup of epsom salts dissolved – this draws out the toxins and dries out the skin faster.
As for homeopathics, I made the mistake the first time my eldest was exposed and showing tiny pink dots, of giving her the Varicella remedy – and it cleared it up as we watched, leaving her with zero immunity, only to get infected next time. While I agree with giving Varicella as a homeoprophylaxis, it is hit and miss and you really should let them have a safe exposure. Otherwise, I always gave Rhus Tox, Hypericum, Ledum and Histaminum to keep histamines/irritation down.
As an addendum, for the official word on what you are putting into your child, here is the government list of each (known) vaccine ingredient. You, as a concerned parent, really should know. For your sake, and that of your child, print it off for your own peace of mind and reference. The contents read like a horror movie – READ HERE

Click to access excipient-table-2.pdf

Help us put the spotlight on the illegal activity of the Australian government. This new No Jab No Pay policy is in contravention of the Australian Constitution. If vaccines are so safe, so effective, then the decision makers, vaccine manufacturers, media heads and all their families won’t mind taking this challenge. Sign and share IMMEDIATELY.

Harvard Trained Immunologist Demolishes California Legislation That Terminates Vaccine Exemptions 117534

The following open letter by a PhD Immunologist completely demolishes the current California legislative initiative to remove all vaccine exemptions. That such a draconian and cynical state statute is under consideration in the ‘Golden State’ is as shocking as it is predictable.  After all, it was mysteriously written and submitted shortly after the manufactured-in-Disneyland measles ‘outbreak’.

vax_ill_collThe indisputable science that is employed by Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD ought to be read by every CA legislator who is entertaining an affirmative vote for SB277.  Dr. Obukhanych skillfully deconstructs the many false and fabricated arguments that are advanced by Big Pharma and the U.S Federal Government as they attempt to implement a nationwideSuper-Vaccination agenda.

When the California Senate refuses to consider authoritative scientific evidence which categorically proves the dangerous vaccine side effects on the schoolchildren, something is very wrong. Such conduct by the Senate constitutes criminal action that endangers the lives and welfare of children. Their official behavior must be acknowledged for what it is — CRIMINAL — and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

An Open Letter to Legislators Currently Considering Vaccine Legislation from Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD in Immunology


Dear Legislator:

My name is Tetyana Obukhanych. I hold a PhD in Immunology.  I am writing this letter in the hope that it will correct several common misperceptions about vaccines in order to help you formulate a fair and balanced understanding that is supported by accepted vaccine theory and new scientific findings.

Do unvaccinated children pose a higher threat to the public than the vaccinated?

It is often stated that those who choose not to vaccinate their children for reasons of conscience endanger the rest of the public, and this is the rationale behind most of the legislation to end vaccine exemptions currently being considered by federal and state legislators country-wide. You should be aware that the nature of protection afforded by many modern vaccines – and that includes most of the vaccines recommended by the CDC for children – is not consistent with such a statement. I have outlined below the recommended vaccines that cannot prevent transmission of disease either because they are not designed to prevent the transmission of infection (rather, they are intended to prevent disease symptoms), or because they are for non-communicable diseases. People who have not received the vaccines mentioned below pose no higher threat to the general public than those who have, implying that discrimination against non-immunized children in a public school setting may not be warranted.

  1. IPV (inactivated poliovirus vaccine) cannot prevent transmission of poliovirus (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #1). Wild poliovirus has been non-existent in the USA for at least two decades. Even if wild poliovirus were to be re-imported by travel, vaccinating for polio with IPV cannot affect the safety of public spaces.  Please note that wild poliovirus eradication is attributed to the use of a different vaccine, OPV or oral poliovirus vaccine. Despite being capable of preventing wild poliovirus transmission, use of OPV was phased out long ago in the USA and replaced with IPV due to safety concerns.
  1. Tetanus is not a contagious disease, but rather acquired from deep-puncture wounds contaminated with C. tetani spores. Vaccinating for tetanus (via the DTaP combination vaccine) cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is intended to render personal protection only.
  1. While intended to prevent the disease-causing effects of the diphtheria toxin, the diphtheria toxoid vaccine (also contained in the DTaP vaccine) is not designed to prevent colonization and transmission of C. diphtheriae. Vaccinating for diphtheria cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is likewise intended for personal protection only.
  1. The acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine (the final element of the DTaP combined vaccine), now in use in the USA, replaced the whole cell pertussis vaccine in the late 1990s, which was followed by an unprecedented resurgence of whooping cough. An experiment with deliberate pertussis infection in primates revealed that the aP vaccine is not capable of preventing colonization and transmission ofB. pertussis (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #2). The FDA has issued a warning regarding this crucial finding.[1]
  • Furthermore, the 2013 meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors at the CDC revealed additional alarming data that pertussis variants (PRN-negative strains) currently circulating in the USA acquired a selective advantage to infect those who are up-to-date for their DTaP boosters (see appendix for the CDC document, Item #3), meaning that people who are up-to-date are more likely to be infected, and thus contagious, than people who are not vaccinated.
  1. Among numerous types of H. influenzae, the Hib vaccine covers only type b. Despite its sole intention to reduce symptomatic and asymptomatic (disease-less) Hib carriage, the introduction of the Hib vaccine has inadvertently shifted strain dominance towards other types of H. influenzae (types a through f).These types have been causing invasive disease of high severity and increasing incidence in adults in the era of Hib vaccination of children (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #4).  The general population is more vulnerable to the invasive disease now than it was prior to the start of the Hib vaccination campaign.  Discriminating against children who are not vaccinated for Hib does not make any scientific sense in the era of non-type b H. influenzae disease.
  1. Hepatitis B is a blood-borne virus. It does not spread in a community setting, especially among children who are unlikely to engage in high-risk behaviors, such as needle sharing or sex. Vaccinating children for hepatitis B cannot significantly alter the safety of public spaces. Further, school admission is not prohibited for children who are chronic hepatitis B carriers. To prohibit school admission for those who are simply unvaccinated – and do not even carry hepatitis B – would constitute unreasonable and illogical discrimination.

In summary, a person who is not vaccinated with IPV, DTaP, HepB, and Hib vaccines due to reasons of conscience poses no extra danger to the public than a person who is.  No discrimination is warranted.

How often do serious vaccine adverse events happen?

It is often stated that vaccination rarely leads to serious adverse events. Unfortunately, this statement is not supported by science. A recent study done in Ontario, Canada, established thatvaccination actually leads to an emergency room visit for 1 in 168 children following their 12-month vaccination appointment and for 1 in 730 children following their 18-month vaccination appointment (see appendix for a scientific study, Item #5).

When the risk of an adverse event requiring an ER visit after well-baby vaccinations is demonstrably so high, vaccination must remain a choice for parents, who may understandably be unwilling to assume this immediate risk in order to protect their children from diseases that are generally considered mild or that their children may never be exposed to.

Can discrimination against families who oppose vaccines for reasons of conscience prevent future disease outbreaks of communicable viral diseases, such as measles?

Measles research scientists have for a long time been aware of the “measles paradox.” I quote from the article by Poland & Jacobson (1994) “Failure to Reach the Goal of Measles Elimination: Apparent Paradox of Measles Infections in Immunized Persons.” Arch Intern Med 154:1815-1820:


Further research determined that behind the “measles paradox” is a fraction of the population called LOW VACCINE RESPONDERS. Low-responders are those who respond poorly to the first dose of the measles vaccine. These individuals then mount a weak immune response to subsequent RE-vaccination and quickly return to the pool of “susceptibles’’ within 2-5 years, despite being fully vaccinated.[3]

Re-vaccination cannot correct low-responsiveness: it appears to be an immuno-genetic trait.[4]  The proportion of low-responders among children was estimated to be 4.7% in the USA.[5]

Studies of measles outbreaks in Quebec, Canada, and China attest that outbreaks of measles still happen, even when vaccination compliance is in the highest bracket (95-97% or even 99%, see appendix for scientific studies, Items #6&7). This is because even in high vaccine responders, vaccine-induced antibodies wane over time.  Vaccine immunity does not equal life-long immunity acquired after natural exposure.

It has been documented that vaccinated persons who develop breakthrough measles are contagious. In fact, two major measles outbreaks in 2011 (in Quebec, Canada, and in New York, NY) were re-imported by previously vaccinated individuals.[6] – [7]

Taken together, these data make it apparent that elimination of vaccine exemptions, currently only utilized by a small percentage of families anyway, will neither solve the problem of disease resurgence nor prevent re-importation and outbreaks of previously eliminated diseases. 

Is discrimination against conscientious vaccine objectors the only practical solution?

The majority of measles cases in recent US outbreaks (including the recent Disneyland outbreak) are adults and very young babies, whereas in the pre-vaccination era, measles occurred mainly between the ages 1 and 15. Natural exposure to measles was followed by lifelong immunity from re-infection, whereas vaccine immunity wanes over time, leaving adults unprotected by their childhood shots. Measles is more dangerous for infants and for adults than for school-aged children.

Despite high chances of exposure in the pre-vaccination era, measles practically never happened in babies much younger than one year of age due to the robust maternal immunity transfer mechanism. The vulnerability of very young babies to measles today is the direct outcome of the prolonged mass vaccination campaign of the past, during which their mothers, themselves vaccinated in their childhood, were not able to experience measles naturally at a safe school age and establish the lifelong immunity that would also be transferred to their babies and protect them from measles for the first year of life.

Luckily, a therapeutic backup exists to mimic now-eroded maternal immunity. Infants as well as other vulnerable or immunocompromised individuals, are eligible to receive immunoglobulin, a potentially life-saving measure that supplies antibodies directed against the virus to prevent or ameliorate disease upon exposure (see appendix, Item #8).

In summary: 1) due to the properties of modern vaccines, non-vaccinated individuals pose no greater risk of transmission of polio, diphtheria, pertussis, and numerous non-type b H. influenzae strains than vaccinated individuals do, non-vaccinated individuals pose virtually no danger of transmission of hepatitis B in a school setting, and tetanus is not transmissible at all; 2) there is a significantly elevated risk of emergency room visits after childhood vaccination appointments attesting that vaccination is  not risk-free; 3) outbreaks of measles cannot be entirely prevented even if we had nearly perfect vaccination compliance; and 4) an effective method of preventing measles and other viral diseases in vaccine-ineligible infants and the immunocompromised, immunoglobulin, is available for those who may be exposed to these diseases. 

Taken together, these four facts make it clear that discrimination in a public school setting against children who are not vaccinated for reasons of conscience is completely unwarranted as the vaccine status of conscientious objectors poses no undue public health risk. 

Sincerely Yours,

Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD

Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD, is the author of the book Vaccine Illusion.  She has studied immunology in some of the world’s most prestigious medical institutions. She earned her PhD in Immunology at the Rockefeller University in New York and did postdoctoral training at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and Stanford University in California.

Dr. Obukhanych offers online classes for those who want to gain deeper understanding of how the immune system works and whether the immunologic benefits of vaccines are worth the risks:  Natural Immunity Fundamentals.


I hereby declare, with my full intent, in perfect and immaculate possession of all my mental faculties, and in complete autonomy of will, purpose, and action, in public notice to all humans, Governments m, agents and entities everywhere, and in particular in public notice to all agencies, departments, and employees of the Australian Government, including Military and Intelligence agencies, departments, and contractors, that:

In my status as a surviving member of the Original Tribes of the land mass known today as Australia, I Have Never Consented and Do Not Consent to myself, my physical body, or my name being considered as co-optable, collaterisable, or employable as an employee, property, or asset of any corporation, including the corporation of Australia, INC., and under the jurisdiction of the Federal Australian Law.

Belonging to a Sovereign people in the country known today as Australia, I do not consent to being considered an Australian citizen and property of a fraudulent Australian corporation, to be made subject to its inhumane laws and statutes, such as the No Jab No Pay legislation, which seems to permit weapons testing on citizens, nor any of its Executive Orders, nor any of its Military directives, exemptions, and appropriations, which glibly ignore Informed Consent and permit human experimentation, psychological operations of deception, behavior modification, and weapons testing on citizens. I am not an Australian l citizen, not a Federal employee, not a Federal soldier, not a Federal asset, not Federal property in any way, shape, or form. I am a living, breathing human being, neither born nor naturalized into servitude of any kind, subject to no law, statute, or presumption of any corporation, but bound rather only by edict of Natural Law to intrinsic freedom of will, speech, action, and creative expression, and to “Do No Harm” to others in society.

I Have Never Consented and Do Not Consent to the use of my body, mind, brain, central nervous system, consciousness, and energy, for any kind of experimentation, monitoring, surveillance, storage, transformation, or any other use, by any body, “person,” or entity, private or Intelligence/Defence/Any Agency, private or Intelligence/Defence/Security contractor, research organization, University, medical institution, or other, for any purpose whatsoever, for any length of time whatsoever.

I Have Never Consented and Do Not Consent to the use, by any body, agency, company, or being, for any purpose whatsoever, whether it is experimentation, monitoring, surveillance, storage, transformation, or any other, of any aspect or part of my self and being, body, mind, intellect, energy, including energetic emanations in the form of Electromagnetic Radiation involuntarily radiated from any part of my body, including my brain–such as thought waves, intrinsically my own intellectual property and my own possession, and not “unintentionally radiated intelligence or RINT or SIGINT” to be freely culled and used for any kind of military or Intelligence Agency purpose whatsoever;

I Have Never Consented and Do Not Consent to the use, by any body, agency, corporation, or being, for any purpose whatsoever, whether it is experimentation, monitoring, surveillance, storage, transformation, or any other, of any aspect or part of my self and being, body, mind, intellect, energy, including plasmas, tissues, cells and DNA, being stolen, picked up, obtained illegitimately by way of covert/privacy intrusion at medical institutions, and used for any kind of military or Intelligence Agency purpose whatsoever, whether to develop genetic weapons or devise genetic programs of Directed-Energy assault or any other;

I Have Never Consented and Do Not Consent to the bombardment of my body with directed-energy such as high-powered microwaves, low-powered microwaves, Extremely Low Frequencies, infrasonic and ultrasonic frequencies, millimeter waves, scalar waves, or any other kind of wave or remote-influencing technology, for any externally-decided and obviously totalitarian, imperialistic, presumptuous, patronizing, patriarchical, and controlling experimental, correctional, behavior-modification, surveillance, monitoring, or any other purpose;

I Have Never Consented and Do Not Consent to the eugenicist and transhumanist flooding of the atmosphere in my vicinity and over the whole of the Earth with harmful aerosols carrying chemicals, biological toxins such as viruses and molds, vaccines, nanotechnology, smart dust, heavy metals such as barium and aluminium, toxic metals like lithium, radioactive materials and other harmful matter that is currently being dumped on human populations everywhere on Earth, for any stated purpose whatsoever, whether solar radiation management, population control, or any other purpose;

I Have Never Consented and Do Not Consent to the programs of secrecy, lies, deceptions, machinations, and manipulations of opinion being carried out on Earth by Military/Security Agents and Intelligence agencies possibly on behalf of other, wealthier and corporate or off-world/extraterrestrial/non-human overseers, carried out on media, and on communities, via manufactured news, false flags, false rumors, slander and defamation campaigns, deceptions, detours, mind control techniques, and mass consciousness-transformation techniques, being used to keep people in a state of permanent obliviousness, fear, confusion, and misinformation;

I Have Never Consented and Do Not Consent to the deliberate pollution of food, medicines, and water with harmful substances intended to and causing of infertility, lowering of mental function, destruction of the human system, and destruction of health, such as flourides in water, harmful additives in food preservatives and coloring agents, GMO produce, and nanotechnology/smart dust in food suppplements and pills.

I Have Never Consented and Do Not Consent to any of the Dirty Ops and covert Black Ops research, experimentation, precursor, or roll-out programs being carried out on myself, on certain targeted individuals, and on whole populations, without Informed Consent. I do not consent to implants that have been forcibly placed in my body, I do not consent to their receptions and transmissions of electromagnetic energy from inside my body, I do not consent to the bidirectional communications initiated externally and involving the transponder elements in these microchip implants. No part of the covert operations of RFID implantation, continuous 24/7 surveillance, monitoring, remote radio/other communications, and assault with Directed-Energy neuroweapons falsely labelled Non-Lethal Weapons has my consent.

This is a Public Notice to state on the record that I have not in any way given consent to the corrupt and covert Australian Intelligence agencies and Defense and Security entities currently illegitimately surveilling and assaulting me 24/7 with Directed-Energy Weapons to do any of the following: to force implants on my body, to surveill and assault continuously, and to continuously engage in radio-signal-exchange with radio-receiving transponder implants forcibly implanted in my body–using false labels of “terrorist/spy” under the The Anti-Terrorism Act 2005, watchlisting without cause, and running insane MKULTRA-style trauma-based 24/7 human subject experimentation and directed-energy radiation weapons testing/training/operation programs on my person.

None of this is consensual, it is an unpermitted, invasive, violent, malicious, and forced assault; it seeks to retaliate against and suppress free speech, expression, and activism against corporate corruption, cruelty, and criminality; and it Will be exposed.

This is a Declaration of Non-Consent to all the invasions, intrusions, assaults, and mutilations performed extra-judicially on my body by the Australian Government and Military agencies and contractors mentioned above, and it is a Notice to all parties involved in these activities to fully cease and desist all such prosecutable and violatory invasions, intrusions, assaults, and mutilations, and to be aware that I fully intend for all these to be fully prosecuted in impending actions in courts of common law, natural law, and international law.

These are crimes against humanity and crimes against my life, my kins life and being, and must and will be aired, first of all in the court of public opinion and knowledge.

I reserve all rights to publish this declaration and to make changes as I see appropriate at any time, in keeping with my own experience, discernment, and discretion.

Published: December 8, 2015
By Kaiyu Bayles

Edited from the source:…/public-notice-declaration-o…/

Ramola D/Dharmaraj/All Rights Reserved

No way!!!! There’s more than 40 different needles given to kids befor their 15 and more of course if your high risk ie Aboriginal sigh.

Why is everyone ok with this and those of us who can’t give up the freedom to choose what’s best for our children have to loose up to $15000/yr in benefits???

99.9% of our mob are immunised, the most highly immunised group in the world and we have the lowest life expctancy.

Hard being the .01% who havent ever immunised their kids and trying to make a stand. We face homelessness again after having our house for just 12 months.

Totally in shock that our kids have to be subjected to this and nobody asks questions.

Current Australian Immunisation Schedule

* Hepatitis B (hepB)a
2 months
* Hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (whooping cough), Haemophilus influenzae type b, inactivated poliomyelitis (polio) (hepB-DTPa-Hib-IPV)
* Pneumococcal conjugate (13vPCV)
* Rotavirus
4 months
* Hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (whooping cough), Haemophilus influenzae type b, inactivated poliomyelitis (polio) (hepB-DTPa-Hib-IPV)
* Pneumococcal conjugate (13vPCV)
* Rotavirus
6 months
* Hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (whooping cough), Haemophilus influenzae type b, inactivated poliomyelitis (polio) (hepB-DTPa-Hib-IPV)
* Pneumococcal conjugate (13vPCV)
* Rotavirus b
12 months
* Haemophilus influenzae type b and meningococcal C (Hib-MenC)
* Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR)
18 months
* Measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (chickenpox) (MMRV)
4 years
* Diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (whooping cough) and inactivated poliomyelitis (polio) (DTPa-IPV)
* Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) (to be given only if MMRV vaccine was not given at 18 months)
10–15 years (contact your State or Territory Health Department for details)
* Varicella (chickenpox) c
* Human papillomavirus (HPV) d
* Diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (whooping cough) (dTpa)

At-risk groups
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders
12–18 months (In high risk areas) e
* Pneumococcal conjugate (13vPCV)
12–24 months (In high risk areas) f
* Hepatitis A
6 months to less than 5 years
* Influenza (flu)
15 years and over
* Influenza (flu)
* Pneumococcal polysaccharide (23vPPV) (medically at risk)
50 years and over
* Pneumococcal polysaccharide (23vPPV)

* Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children require a fourth dose of pneumococcal vaccine (13vPCV) at 12-18 months of age for children living in high risk areas (Queensland, Northern Territory, Western Australia and South Australia). Contact your State or Territory Health Department for details.
* Hepatitis A vaccine: two doses of Hepatitis A vaccine for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children living in high risk areas (Queensland, Northern Territory, Western Australia and South Australia). Contact your State or Territory Health Department for details.

Could this be driving the epidemic of Sudden Infant Death (SIDS)?

A new study published in Current Medicine and Chemistry titled, “Sudden infant death following hexavalent vaccination: a neuropathologic study,” lends support for the long theorized link between an ever-expanding number of infant vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS).

The fact that the peak age for SIDS is 2–4 months, which coincides with the introduction of 11 shots containing 16 vaccines (within the US immunization schedule), is so obvious a cause for concern, that even the CDC has been compelled to address the seeming ‘coincidence’ directly:

“From 2 to 4 months old, babies begin their primary course of vaccinations. This is also the peak age for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The timing of these two events has led some people to believe they might be related…With babies receiving multiple doses of vaccines during their first year of life and SIDS being the leading cause of death in babies between one month and one year of age, CDC has led research studies to look for possible linkage.”

Unsurprisingly, the CDC, whose pro-vaccine agenda is glaringly oblivious to the 100+ documented serious, unintended adverse effects of vaccines as evidenced in the biomedical literature, claims extensive research they commissioned has found vaccines do not cause SIDS. Despite the CDC’s dismissal, infant mortality rates are highest among countries that administer the most vaccines within the most vulnerable developmental window of infanthood. A 2011 study published in Human & Experimental Toxicology, for instance, observed that “The US childhood immunization schedule specifies 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year—the most in the world—yet 33 nations have lower IMRs [infant mortality rates].” They found that across the 34 nations analyzed “a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates, with r = 0.992 (p = 0.0009).”

Also, a recent study published in Vaccine titled, “Co-administration of live measles and yellow fever vaccines and inactivated pentavalent vaccines is associated with increased mortality compared with measles and yellow fever vaccines only” found multiple infant vaccines dramatically increased the risk of mortality in a trial conducted in the West African country of Guinea-Bissau.

While the 6-antigen hexavalent vaccine most recently linked to SIDS is presently only licensed in Europe, there are a number of ‘mandatory’ multi-dose vaccines in the US immunization schedule — including (DTaP, MMR), and which brings up the question: are the risks for adverse reactions – including lethal ones — amplified in multi-dose vaccines in comparison to single dose forms?

There are also a wide range of vaccines in development or already on the market, which are being included or will be included eventually on top of an ever-expanding immunization schedule:

a) Pentacel (DTaP, ActHIB & IPV),

b) Comvax (Hep B & PedvaxHIB),

c) Pediarix (DTaP, IPV, & Hep B),

d) ProQuad (MMR-Varicella),

e) ActHIB – HIB & Tetanus Toxoid, or HIB & DaPT,

f) Hiberix (HIB & Tetanus Toxoid),

g) PedvaxHIB (HIB & meningococcal serotype B antigen),

h) Menhibrix (meningococcal grps C & Y, HIB & Tetanus Toxoid)

i) Menactra (meningococcal grps A, C, Y, W-135 & Diphtheria Toxoid)

j) Prevnar-13 (13 strains of streptococcus pneumonia & Diphteria Protein)

Dr. Larry Palevsky, MD, has pointed out that

“Even if vaccines only purportedly contain 1 bacterial or viral antigen (as in Varicella & Hepatitis A), there are multiple antigens inside of them making them multivalent in and of themselves. And, they are most often given at the same time as other vaccines, making these single antigen vaccines into multivalent injections.

They can consist of bacterial, viral or even yeast antigens, as well as known environmental toxins, proteins, & other contaminant bacteria, viruses, and yeast. By definition, all vaccines, in and of themselves, are multivalent. 

Despite the fact that the Varicella vaccine contains only 1 reported viral antigen, the injection of this vaccine is still an injection into the body of multiple antigens, i.e., sucrose, hydrolyzed gelatin, sodium chloride, monosodium glutamate (MSG), sodium phosphate dibasic, potassium phosphate monobasic, potassium chloride, and residual components of the MRC-5 cells on which the varicella virus was isolated, including DNA, protein, and trace quantities of monobasic, EDTA, neomycin, and fetal bovine serum. 

The injection of the Hepatitis A vaccine, despite only containing 1 reported viral antigen, also contains multiple antigens, i.e., aluminum hydroxide, amino acids, disodium phosphate, mono potassium phosphate, neomycin sulphate, polysorbate-20, potassium chloride, sodium chloride, and water. 

Here are the known pathogenic ingredients in the vaccine schedule:

DaPT – 3 bacteria

HIB – 1 bacterium

Prevnar -13 – 13 bacteria

Menactra – 4 bacteria

Hepatitis B – 1 virus

Hepatitis A – 1 virus

Polio – 3 viruses

Influenza – 3 viruses

MMR – 3 viruses

Varicella – 1 virus

Rotavirus – 5 viruses

Gardisil – 4 viruses

The Pentacel combination vaccine (DTaP, Polio, HIB), given to children at 2, 4, 6, & 15-18 months contains the ActHIB vaccine (HIB & tetanus), along with a multitude of other bacterial (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus) & viral (3 polio) antigens. The Comvax combination vaccine (Hep B + HIB), given to infants 3 times within their first year of life, contains the Hepatitis B viral antigen & Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast antigen, along with the Pedvax HIB vaccine (HIB bacterium + Neisseria meningococcal serotype B bacterial antigen). 

The human immune system does not play favorites with injected antigens. In other words, a non-bacterial or non-viral vaccine antigen is responded to equally by the immune system, as any of the bacterial and viral antigens.”

Given the number of ‘antigenic’ exposures in vaccines, singularly, and in multi-dose form, the number of possible immunological reactions in newborns is simply mind-blowing – especially considering just how little we know about the immune system, the developing brain and infant physiology.

Hexavalent Vaccine and SIDS: Looking at the Studies

Given the weight of evidence linking infant vaccines to higher mortality, this new paper’s findings should not be of great surprise.

Researchers “examined a large number of sudden infant death syndrome victims in order to point out a possible causal relationship between a previous hexavalent vaccination and the sudden infant death.” They selected 110 cases for review, finding that in “13 cases (11.8%) the death occurred in temporal association with administration of the hexavalent vaccine (from 1 to 7 days).” None of the victims had congenital developmental alterations of brain structures known to regulate vital functions.  While brain abnormalities were noted, and while the researchers stated that their study does not prove a causal relationship between hexavalent vaccines and SIDS, they hypothesized that “vaccine components could have a direct role in sparking off a lethal outcome in vulnerable babies.” They concluded:

“[W]e sustain the need that deaths occurring in a short space of time after hexavalent vaccination are appropriately investigated and submitted to a post-mortem examination particularly of the autonomic nervous system by an expert pathologist to objectively evaluate the possible causative role of the vaccine in SIDS.”

This is by no means the first report in the medical literature linking hexavalent vaccines to SIDS. A quick search on will reveal quite a few others, dating back to an initial 2006 report published in the journal Vaccine titled, “Unexplained cases of sudden infant death shortly after hexavalent vaccination,” concluding after post-mortem autopsies that these were cases of “possibly fatal complications after application of hexavalent vaccines.”

In 2011, a study was published in Statistics in Medicine titled “A modified self-controlled case series method to examine association between multidose vaccinations and death,” found that based on the review of 300 unexplained sudden unexpected deaths (uSUD) following either penta- or hexavalent, “a 16-fold risk increase after the 4th dose could be detected with a power of at least 90 per cent,” and “A general 2-fold risk increase after vaccination could be detected with a power of 80 per cent.”

Another 2011 study published in PLoS titled “Sudden unexpected deaths and vaccinations during the first two years of life in Italy: a case series study,” investigated a signal of an association between vaccination in the second year of life with a hexavalent vaccine and sudden unexpected deaths (SUD) in the two day window following vaccination, which was reported in Germany in 2003.  The Italian study sought to establish whether hexavalent vaccines increased the short-term risk of SUD in infants. The study analyzed 604 infants who died of SUD, 244 (40%) of whom had received at least one vaccination. Four deaths occurred within two days from vaccination with the hexavalent vaccines, representing a 50% increase in relative risk. The relative risk for SUD for the risk periods 0-7 and 0-14 days were 100% [2.0 RR] and 50% [1.5 RR] higher, respectively. The study concluded that there was a 120% [2.2 RR] increased risk associated with the first dose of hexavalent vaccine.

Clearly, both case studies and broad epidemiological studies confirm the possibility that hexavalent vaccination can be lethal in susceptible individuals.  The next important question is what is the mechanism?

One of the first studies to offer an explanation was published in 2006 in the international journal of pathology, Virchows Archives titled, “Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: another pathology in suspected SIDS?“. The study discussed how previous expert analysis performed by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products in 2003, following an investigation they conducted into the emergence of a link between hexavalent vaccines and 5 cases of infant deaths that occurred, paid little attention “to examination of the brainstem and the cardiac conduction systems on serial sections, nor was the possibility of a triggering role of the vaccine in these deaths considered.”  The study goes on to report on the autopsy findings of a 3-month old female infant who died suddenly and unexpectedly immediately after the administration of the hexavalent vaccine. The autopsy revealed “The cardiac conduction system presented persistent fetal dispersion and resorptive degeneration.” The author hypothesized, “[T]he unexpected death of this vulnerable baby (infant with bilateral hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus) could have been triggered by the hexavalent vaccination. This case is consistent with the triple-risk model of SIDS,[1] a hypothesis comprising an underlying biological vulnerability to exogenous stressors and some triggering factors in a critical developmental period.”

The report concluded:

“This case offers a unique insight into the possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby. Any case of sudden unexpected death occurring perinatally and in infancy, especially soon after a vaccination, should always undergo a full necropsy study according to our guidelines.”

Another case study published in Forensic Science International in 2008 titled, “Beta-tryptaseand quantitative mast-cell increase in a sudden infant death following hexavalent immunization,” described a fatal case of a 3-month-old female infant, who died within 24 h of vaccination with hexavalent vaccine from vaccine-induced shock. They concluded:

“…that acute respiratory failure likely due to post hexavalent immunization-related shock was the cause of death.”

The potential for hexavalent vaccine induced shock has even been acknowledged by the vaccine’s manufacturer. GlaxoSmithKline’s hexavalent vaccine (INFANRIX) PDF insert describes post-marketing surveillance data on adverse reactions which include within the section on ‘Nervous system disorders’ the following side effect: “Collapse or shock-like state (hypotonic-hyporesponsiveness episode).”

The aforementioned information clearly indicates that hexavalent vaccine is a possible cause of infant death mistakenly or intentionally attributed to an idiopathic syndrome – SIDS – in order to hide the lethal risks associated with routine immunizations. This leaves parents with the question: could the slippery slope of simultaneous vaccine delivery represent a lethal intervention for my newborn? One that is unlikely to be recognized as such, but for which the literature suggests is a real and present danger? It seems that it may have required the design of hexavalent vaccines to demonstrate the true hubris in reckless injection of immunogenic material into our most vulnerable.


[1] Filiano JJ, Kinney HC (1994) A perspective on neuropathologic findings in victims of sudden infant death syndrome: the triple risk model. Biol Neonate 65:194–197



No Jab, No Pay/Play – implications for families presently holding a conscientious objection in Australia

Source: No Jab, No Pay/Play – implications for families presently holding a conscientious objection in Australia

Previous Older Entries

A little about page admin Kaiyu Moura (Bayles)

Now living in QLD raising her children on their traditional country, gathering food, learning the old art of building shelters, dance and the local language. For the past 20 years with her late Grandmother Maureen Watson and a dance group with 6 of her sisters Kaiyu travelled schools, festivals, events etc sharing the beauty of First Nations Culture through song and dance, stories, art, theatre, nursery rhymes, poetry etc and engaging all ages in different projects that inspire positive change. Also a poet, documentary maker, songwriter, artist, event organiser, media consultant, testing the waters of micro social enterprise by starting her own tshirt and sublimation printing business and with her own label, Kaiyu creates what she calls Freedom Threads.

After building their own home on Tribal Sovereign land, Kaiyu is now homeschooling and teaching the kids about making our own tinctures, learning about bushtucker and mushrooms, growing food, building with aircrete, setting up wind turbines, composting toilets and ram water pumps... Really learning what it truly means to thrive. This is our Group where we share alot of what we do

Kaiyu and the Tribe