Petition – Declaration of Dissent to the Voice, Treaty Truth Process
For proper informed consent, you have to officially end the hostilities first before any treaty “negotiations” can commence, duress and undue influence are just two of the obvious reasons why. Robbie Thorpe
Petition EN5112 – Declaration of Dissent to the Voice, Treaty Truth Process
https://www.aph.gov.au/e-petitions/petition/EN5112
Petition Reason
The entire process lacks the consent of the very people it will affect. The Original people of the land have not consented to this process. The Voice, Treaty, Truth Process is being sold as a good thing for all Australians, the legalise used throughout the process has dual meaning. Making the process a fraud as it’s implying one thing, yet means another. We the people of Australia, did not elect these 250 representatives to speak on our behalf, they have no authority. The process is dishonourable, this is not the proper way to gain consent of the natives and legitimise the nation’s occupancy terms. This process lacks legal scrutiny for the people it is supposed to protect. The crown must be held responsible for the historical crimes and grievances. This process risks ceding Tribal Sovereignty by usurping using trickery
Petition Request
We therefore ask the House to hear our declaration of Dissent to the the Voice, Treaty, Truth Process because: Tribal sovereignty is not just a spiritual notion, but as real as the Westminster law system. The Original People are not Australian Citizens and should not be included in the Australian Constitution. It’s not fair, 90% of the population will vote on something that only affects the Original people of the land, making this entire process lacking in democratic integrity and breaches our human rights through the continuing racially motivated policies. Australians shouldn’t be burdened with a huge decision like this that affects a certain section of society. The constitution is invalid lawfully. Non Est Factum
These lands were not a Terra Nullius, yet the British Crown claimed them as such.
The upcoming Referendum is very much related to the Mabo Decision, but it’s rarely mentioned.
The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia is currently a Terra Nullius Constitution, given authority, not by it’s ties to the peoples of these lands, but by the Monarch of Britain.
PM Albo made this statement a few days ago
(Note, the member for Berowra is Julian Leeser)
“The First Nations constitutional convention was held at Uluru in 2017, just more than six years ago, and it was time to commemorate the date of the 1967 referendum.
That arose out of originally the proposal from John Howard as Prime Minister who went to the election in 2007, saying that he would support a referendum on constitutional recognition.”
(why didn’t he mention it was at the same time as Howard had introduced the NT Intervention? Oh that’s right, the Intervention was bi-partisan and supported by Pearson and Langton )
“Then the Gillard government began a process with constitutional recognition working group that led to the process of people including the Member for Berowra and others like Noel Pearson, other senior, legal commentators, working on proposals and then a series of consultations in the lead up to the earlier restatement, in the lead up to that constitutional convention. When that occurred then, was the former Coalition government went through a range of processes. There was a jointly chaired inquiry that was then chaired by Senator Patrick Watson and the Member for Berowra that made recommendations.
There was then a process set up, chaired by Tom Calma and Marcia Langton.”
So it seems that this was all a Government initiative, masked as coming from First Nations’ Peoples, A form of Manufactured Consent. Consent, yes, framed as Consent, that thing that Captain Cook never asked for, and no Governor sent from England was ever ordered to seek.
How deceptive is this process?
As Robbie Thorpe put it so clearly
“Who and why are we voting when Elders in councils, bloodline back to the territory are the representative voices, custodians, caretakers and guardians and holders of the law here. Inalienable inherent rights, next of kin. Just recognize The true sovereigns. Restore, restitute, recognize, respect. I believe in treaty, let’s get it right.”
But it seems that His Majesty’s Governments have other plans.
Beware, and take care out there.
There’s deception afoot.
Over 100 articles on Constitution Recognition:
thrivalinternational 