What To Do When Stopped By Police

Record Everything

For Quick Reference Save The Know Your Rights Card To Your Phone and the pics on this page

Pls save to your phone and send to mob to do same

Listen to brother Keenan Mundine explain important info about how to talk to police

https://fb.watch/7IpLb-GEyw/

Front of card
back of card

The number to call for NSW/ACT is 1800 765 767 but u can’t call from a mobile

AdvocateMe Lawyers – 0425 754 299 (just not available on weekend, send text message)

See video for example on how to deal with police acting unlawfully https://fb.watch/7GJ01mnJJg/

This article from 16th august 2021states –

“Now that police have extra powers and are joined on the ground by 800 members of the Australian Defence Force, we are extremely concerned about the potential for Aboriginal people to again be targeted and intimidated,” Mr Carter said.

Yet we are seeing exactly what they warned the police not to do.

The ALS must be made aware of all the cases of police harassment in our communities.

https://www.miragenews.com/operation-stay-home-must-not-be-excuse-to-614117/

please read this carefully, what their doing is unlawful

#NoFear #KeepingMobSafe #JustSayNo

Join our Facebook group for support or to keep informed or

Read up, here are some useful links

https://apov.xyz/aus-rights/

5 KEY LINKS – QR CODES, MASKS, FINES

MANDATORY QR CODES

1. Businesses have been told that the QR check-in is ‘mandatory’, however, this is NOT a legal mandate. It is actually illegal to enforce people to check in with a QR code or to refuse service to a person who doesn’t scan the QR code (Amendment to Section 94H of the Federal Government Privacy Act 1988). The penalty for enforcing QR scanning or service can be a 5-year jail term or 300 penalty units (PRIVACY ACT 1988 SEC 94 H).

www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/pa1988108/s94h.html

STATE VS FEDERAL LAWS

2. As state and federal laws can contradict each other, it’s good to know that federal laws override and invalidate conflicting state laws and business directives, including the ones demanding the “COVIDSafe” QR check in (Section 109 of the Commonwealth Constitution).

BUSINESSES REFUSING CUSTOMERS WITHOUT MASK

3. You can be fined $5000, for refusing  goods or services to people NOT wearing a mask. This is because customers may have a lawful exemption such as a medical condition. As a business owner, you are not lawfully able to ask customers for PROOF of their medical exemption, as that information is protected under the Privacy Act. However, you can ask if they have a medical exemption, be aware under the Privacy Act that they are not required to respond (Disability Discrimination Act 1992 sec 24,25,26).

www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2018C00125

PERSON DOES NOT HAVE TO PROVIDE PERSONAL INFORMATION

4. It is actually unlawful to discriminate against someone who is not wearing a mask or refuses to supply their personal information if you are allowing other members of the public to enter your premises (The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act – Part 2 Section 8). Under this Act, we are all equal before the law without discrimination and has the right to protection against discrimination.

www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017C00143

MASKS DON’T WORK

5. There is a large amount of peer reviewed and anedotal evidence to show Masks to not protect your from Coronavirus.

Understand this… the law IS on your side and is on the side of the Federal Government. It is NOT on the side of the State Government. They act illegitimately and illegally and will be charged. If found guilty…punished.

LEGAL TEMPLATE BY ADVOCATE ME

https://www.advocateme.com.au/templates

Tool Kit For Everything You Need

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1XvRU5dDQ3iHGIX75lObFwYitHq2aLObS

POLICE ARRESTING ABORIGINAL AND TAKING THEM TO ISOLATION, THEY CLAIM THEY ARE HIGH RISK

Police Door Knocking in NSW Australia

4 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Caltrop
    Aug 29, 2021 @ 18:29:42

    de jure sanguinis coronae

    [video src="https://theaustraliaproject.org/img/KB-vid.mp4" /]

    Definition:
    Ancient Latin legal maxim literally meaning “concerning (the) law of (the) blood of crowns” In COMMON LAW since the end of the 16th Century, royal or noble blood has claimed superior status — in particular to the freedom of their body, protection of property and the obligation of any matter brought against then to follow DUE PROCESS (of the LAW), especially right of RELIEF. When an individual claims de jure sanguinis coronae, providing they demonstrate a comprehension of the term and why they should be granted such status (for example–knowledge of the valid argument that you are of royal birth by virtue of being Sons and Daughters of the King of Kings) then the COURT must grant such recognition. This means any failure of DUE PROCESS or failure to account for RELIEF by the COURT obligates to compensate the individual accused.

    Reply

  2. Trackback: How Covid Is Affecting Aboriginal Communities In Australia | thrivalinternational
  3. John Mareco
    Sep 01, 2021 @ 07:37:08

    The government will use this to get rid of anything that currently is or will soon be living off the social security.

    Thank you for spreading the helpful information.

    Reply

  4. Trackback: Protection For All Under Tribal Law | thrivalinternational

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: