Since losing my parents who knew so much about traditional health, I’m always on the lookout for new suporfoods and the missing puzzle pieces for ultimate health.
Cell-mediated immunity. T lymphocytes do not secrete antibodies. this response incorporates activated macrophages, natural killer cells, antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes as well as release of cytokines.
You are here: Home / Cancer Treatments / GcMAF: A Potential Anti-Cancer Therapy? Print this article
GcMAF: A Potential Anti-Cancer Therapy?
By Dr. David Jockers DC, MS, CSCS December 11, 2017 5,208 Facebook SharesTweetShare5KPin115KSHARES
Editor’s Note: This article first appeared in the Feb 2016 edition of TTAC’s Heroes Against Cancer member newsletter
What if scientists had already discovered and tested an effective cure for cancer and other chronic diseases? Do you think it would be celebrated and used to benefit patients all around the world… or do you think there may be an attempt to suppress the knowledge of such a treatment?
Could the medical doctors who have tested this and used it successfully even be in danger for their lives?
A wide variety of cancers were treated using the GcMAF treatment in clinical research as reported by Dr. Steve Hofman. These cancer types included:
Operation Sea Lion was a major wargame conducted at Royal Military Academy Sandhurst in 1974. Its aim was to find out what might have happened had Nazi Germany launched Operation Sea Lion, their planned invasion of southeast England during World War II, in September 1940. The wargame was organised by the Daily Telegraph and Dr Paddy Griffith from the Department of War Studies at Sandhurst. The British umpires were Air Chief Marshal Christopher Foxley-Norris, Rear Admiral Teddy Gueritz and Major General Glyn Gilbert. The German umpires were General Adolf Galland (air), Admiral Friedrich Ruge (naval) and General Heinrich Trettner (land). After the game’s conclusion, all the umpires unanimously concluded that the invasion was a devastating defeat for the German invasion force
Game preparation and methodologyEditThere was “a computerised ‘Battle of Britain’ phase “(the computer filled a whole large room…)” prior to the start of the game, simulating a continuation of the Luftwaffe assault against RAF airbases in Kent and Sussex; and predicting both the actual extent of British and German aircraft losses, and the (vastly inflated) claimed air victories being reported by German pilots in intelligence reports to the German commanders. Consequently, the German side started with the erroneous intelligence that continued RAF resistance over the South East had only been achieved through stripping fighter units from the rest of the country, and hence that achieving German air superiority was a realistic prospect, sufficient to justify seizing the opportunity offered by likely last fair weather of autumn 1940. By this device, the Game designers were able to justify the counterfactual of Sea Lion being launched, even though actual air superiority had not been achieved. The computerised “Battle of Britain” preliminaries (programmed by Ivan Collier) lasted several days before the main event.[3] Umpires were allowed to make decisions based on their own intuition (like game masters in a role-playing game) and not in the way wargames are usually played. Preparation involved giving each player a written brief telling them what was known, what was expected of them and how they should behave in the game. Paddy Griffith was the “Grand High Umpire.” There were six other ‘umpires of first recourse’: two for land, and one each for railways, sea, air and political.[3] These were: Andy Callan, John Davis, Michael Orr, Dennis Barr, Nigel de Lee and Tony Thomas. They “took ‘orders’ from the playing teams, and usually fed back routine ‘reports’ locally, without referring them upwards for higher adjudication by the prestigious team of eight international generals and admirals. That happened only when contentious or controversial issues arose that the ‘prestigious team’ could constructively debate.” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea_Lion_(wargame)
A COVID ‘ring of steel’ around Sydney would play havoc with Australia’s supply chains
If you love what we do, why not buy us a coffee n help us help community
We’re volunteering our time to keep you up to date n ahead of the game. Work with us to continue doing what nobody else can, shout us a coffee please if you appreciate our work and want to see more from us.
For a decade we have maintained the website and over 10 pages and groups on social media unassisted. If you appreciate the big stories, digs and urgent actions we get out please support our work, subscribe by hitting the black button or donate here – paypal.me/kaiyumoura In these days especially out bush, a little goes a long way, so please dig deep and share.
Yes I’m talking to all of you on social media posting photos proudly after getting shot up with poison and even worse, the ones pushing the government propaganda when the shot is killing 10,000s globally.
Pat Turner, Aiden Ridgeway and others all posing up having their shots like sheep to the slaughter poor fullas, telling others to do the same!
Elizabeth Whymara is pushing it hard, shame job. And could find herself in line to appear at the Nuremberg trials, for aiding and abetting the biggest global genocide. Very sad to see her pushing white mans poison that is killing people globally.
She has a huge reach and blood on her hands if people die from her influencing their choice. She’s not a medical professional so should not be giving anyone health advice.
The real experts globally will tell you this vaccine is a weapon, neither safe or effective. If you can’t prove it’s safety, you all need to stop pushing this on our mob. Show us one piece of evidence that this is safe or effective before you get on the defensive or post another lot of bs. There is no evidence to prove any vaccine is safe or effective, so stop listening to the msm and listen to mob telling you straight up.
I’ll be making sure my kids know who all the turncoats of our time were, fancy siding with the oppressor.afyer all they have done to our mob.
Stop The Fear Mongering
Koori Mail, Indigenous Times, NITV
NONE OF YOU HAVE REPORTED THE TRUTH
Not one black jounro and only a couple of “high profile” blackfullas have spoken out about this mass genocide
Massive props and respect goes out to my brothers Choc Mundine, Jandamarra Cadd and the very few elders speaking out. Thank you for your truth, honor and integrity shown during the biggest crime against humanity. We see u! Apologies if I’ve missed anyone here, there’s bn so few voices of reason sadly.
Covid-19: Doctors’ call for legal protection against claims of unlawful killing is rejected
Exclusive: Morrison ignored chief health officers’ advice
The media and gov are not following health experts, they are ignoring them. Drs are paid to shoot people up with this shit, the chief health officer has admitted the vaccines are causing more harm then benefit and 60% of drs in UK have admitted they are aware their patients have suffered a severe adverse reactions after the shot.
Everyone from clergy to politicians have repeatedly said we must “follow the science”. But have lockdowns, social distancing, masking, testing, and vaccination actually been following the science? In this powerful documentary, you’ll hear renowned scientists explain how the path we’re on may not be “following the science” at all…
A Freedom of Information request to the Australian drugs regulator that approved the Pfizer vaccine confirms that they have never seen the study data
A freedom of information request (FOI) request was made by one of our members in February 2021 to the Australian drugs regulator, the TGA (Therapeutic Good Administration) to ask what should have been simple questions. The TGA is the Australian equivalent of the FDA (US), MHRA (UK) and EMA (Europe) and is held in high regard worldwide. Essentially the FOI questions were:
Did the TGA request the raw data from Pfizer
Did any of the committees approving the vaccine look at the raw data and/or discuss it
What were the “studies” referred to in the approval document relating to teratogenicity (risk of harm to a fetus)
The rationale of the request relates to concern over the validity and verifiability of Pfizer’s data given its legal history (and expressed by Peter Doshi in the BMJ in February) as well as the proven concerns over fraudulent data relating to Covid-19 as seen in the “Lancetgate” scandal of June 2020.
The document below is a redacted version of the documents that were sent by the TGA in response to this request. What they show is that the TGA never saw or requested the patient data from Pfizer and simply accepted their reporting of their study as true. This means that when the head of the TGA John Skerritt said that “the safety evidence is pretty thorough” on the 6th February (here) his words would ring hollow to most Australians who have assumed, rightly or wrongly, that the TGA had actually looked at the patient data themselves.
FYI if your really into saving lives, here’s the info people need to hear
Here are some reasons why people should think twice before getting the C-19 vaccine:
Average vaccines take 10 years to develop and roll out, C-19 Vaccines took less than one year.
First time mRNA used in a vaccine.
Clinical trials are only scheduled to conclude in 2023.
Greg Hunt declared we are the clinical trial yet never requested our informed consent.
Adverse events including deaths are pouring in all over the world.
Vaccine companies are immune from liability.
WHO doubts vaccine effectiveness.
Government lied about Astrazeneca safety.
If the vaccine is so great, why is the government using coercion to intimidate people into getting injected?
The vaccine roll out is at odds with official TGA statements that declares vaccines must provide benefits that greatly outweigh risks (that has not been demonstrated)
Experts who speak out are getting censored.
Put aside all these rational reasons, simply not wanting a vaccine is also a perfectly acceptable reason for not getting injected.
27 Practical reasons why you might want to reconsider getting the C-19 shot.
1) GPS paid 3x to administer C-19 jab compared to flu.
2) Total indemnity for C-19 producers.
3) $40m spent on pro vaccine propaganda.
4) TGA policy on advertising and making therapeutic claims has been discarded for C-19 vaccines.
5) Mandated C-19 jabs for aged care workers.
6) 24/7 advertising by media.
7) Coercion from private sector.
8) Coercion from government.
9) Coercion from media.
10) Coercion from celebrities.
11) Military called in.
12) Private sector called in.
13) Clinical trials still underway.
14) Adverse events including death mounting by the day.
15) MRNA used in vaccines for the first time.
16) Alternate remedies for COVID have been criminalized.
17) Informed consent is not required.
18) AHPRA threatening health workers for expressing alternate views.
19) TGA policy on vaccines has been discarded.
20) Censorship of debate.
21) Total indemnity for GPS, even if they give AZ to people under 60.
22) Requirement for prescription (as per TGA S4 standards) has been discarded.
23) Unchecked therapeutic claims able to be made by politicians and people of influence.
24) Risk vs Benefit is inconclusive.
25) Media is suppressing information regarding risks.
26) Experts who hold alternate views are censored on social media.
27) Experts who hold alternate views are ignored by the government.
Resources
Doctors who explain clearly why vaccines aren’t safe or effective.
Put in 3 different places, front door, halfway through house and back door
No-one in this house has been served with a Biosecurity Control Order under section 60.
No-one in this house is sick or has Covid19.
I/We do not consent to be part of this experiment or clinical trial with injections or any other medical procedures.
Please leave our premises as you have no legal right to be here.
🇦🇺G&B Lawyers 🇦🇺 📌2nd July 2021 ·
Any law that purports to make it mandatory for a person to submit to a COVID-19 vaccination is invalid. In 1945, the then Chief Justice Latham held that quarantine laws “may be regarded in most, if not all, of its aspects as a form of public health legislation”. The Commonwealth has the power under section 51(ix) of the Constitution to make laws with respect to ‘quarantine’. This is a power granted to the Commonwealth. Not the States. At [257] of the decision, Latham CJ held that the Commonwealth “could not pass a law requiring citizens of the States… to submit to vaccination or immunization”. So there are several important things that flow from this High Court decision.
Vaccinations and immunizations are matters that fall within the category of ‘quarantine’.
Only the Commonwealth has the power to make laws with respect to ‘quarantine’ under section 51(ix) of the Constitution.
The Commonwealth is prohibited from passing laws requiring citizens to submit to vaccination or immunization (which are quarantine matters).
The States have no power to make laws with respect to quarantine, including matters dealing with vaccinations and immunizations (as Latham CJ held that these things are ‘quarantine’ matters).
The States are unable to do something that the Commonwealth is prohibited from doing under the exercise of the quarantine power.
Therefore the States cannot pass any law that requires citizens to submit to vaccination or immunization.
Part 3B of the Public Health (COVID-19 Air Transportation Quarantine) Order (No 2) (NSW) 2021 is invalid.
All workers who have been identified under the ‘NSW Airport and Quarantine Workers’ Vaccination Program’ should consider the above before making any decision as to whether to have a COVID-19 vaccination.
see comments for screenshot from G&B Lawyers 👇🏻👇🏻 🔘https://t.me/lockstepaustralia/1536
Letter to a school withdrawing consent for covid jab of children
Dear Mr/Mrs
I am writing to you with to expressly forbid my child/children from being vaccinated for COVID 19 in the event that the Government implements a policy of doing so.
In the absence of parental consent, should the Government, vaccinator and/or school seek to apply the ‘Gillick Competency Test’ then I will submit the following:
As of 18 May 2021, 33 Children between the ages of 10 and 19 have sadly died with COVID (1). However, as of 13 May 2021 there have been 374 reported deaths following the Pfizer Vaccine, 786 from the Oxford/Astra Zeneca (AZ) Vaccine and 4 from the Moderna Vaccine (2). It cannot therefore be argued that the benefits of COVID vaccines for children outweigh the risks. Of course, clinical trials regarding the efficacy the AZ Vaccine on children were paused following concerns relating to fatal blood clotting (*3).
Participants of the Phase Ill trial will be monitored for a further 2 years (4). As such the phase Ill trial is not yet complete and accordingly, the long-term side effects are unknown. The Gillick Competency test requires that a child is advised on the potential risks and implications arising from ‘treatment'(5). It is not therefore possible to advise any lay person; let alone a child as to the potential side effects. As such the Gillick Test cannot be satisfied.
Given the fact that the long-term side effects are unknown, children must be advised as to the potential long terms side effects such as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) (6) and Vaccine Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED) (7). These complex vaccine induced conditions are not easily comprehendible, particularly for children.
Side effects from coronavirus vaccination are not without precedent. In 2009 6 million [mostly] children were vaccinated against the swine flu, many of whom suffered brain injury. As a result, the government were ordered to pay £60m in compensation.(*8)
This is not an exhaustive list but I trust that you understand my concerns regarding the ethical issues regarding consent and the potential unknown side effects. I fear that children will be killed and/or seriously injured by these vaccines and the benefit does not outweigh the potential harm. It should be borne in mind that the manufacturers of the vaccines have been granted immunity from liability for any harm caused by their vaccines (*9) Therefore any liability could fall on the government, the vaccinator or the school.
Please acknowledge receipt of this letter by signing and returning the attached copy.
Great news everyone…. Serene Teffaha (class action lawyer) has prepared a series of templates for declining the vaxine, masks, PCR tests, etc… for all to use in Australia. Here is the link, you need to sign up to access the templates, all free…. she is a legend!
This is why i fight, born in the frontline. this photo was taken 40 years ago. My Mum on the ground in front of pram being arrested by the dogs and leaving me n sister to be taken home by family at games protest 82 — Stolenwealth Games in Brisbane, Australia. This government dont care about children, didnt then and dont now. Photo courtesy of Juno Gemes
thrivalinternational 